Talk:Scottsdale Fashion Square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was listed on Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion, and the consensus was keep: see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Scottsdale Fashion Square


Removal of Irrelevant Content[edit]

I just removed several sections/paragraphs on areas near, but not part of the Mall. They don't belong in this article. However, they would be good in an article on Scottsdale itself.

But this article isn't about Scottsdale, it's only a about a Mall that's located there.

I tagged this article to draw attention to what you are reading now. If anyone can justify restoring what I deleted, by all means do so, but as they were, they just did not seem relevant. --angrykeyboarder (a/k/a:Scott) (talk) 11:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the region is heavily influenced by SFS and Waterfront and 5th Ave shops are often lumped together with the shopping mall. Scottsdale Fashion Square has become more of a shopping region term, used by the City of Scottsdale. A lot of old town Scottsdale is referred to as Fashion Square area (when referring to retail or dining.) Since almost all the recent development boom was ignited after the luxury boom at Fashion Square, its role and influence on these shops is irrefutable. The sections on Southbridge/Waterfront are definitely most relevant. Most tourists also know that, and companies such as Southwest and other travel companies liike AAA refer to the area as the Scottsdale FAshion Square shopping area. Steel87 (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed retail stores that have no current plans, or have not signed a lease thus far. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.180.155.14 (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Scottsdale Fashion Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]