This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
I believe that the caption should change from “1933” to “Goebbels in 1933” because simply saying “1933” sounds incomplete. Paleontologist99 (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It tells you all you need to know. We already know the image is of Magda Goebbels, all we need to know is from where and when. Since we don't see to know where it was taken, what's left is when. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with BMK. There’s no reason to include the name again, it is unnecessary redundancy. Especially, since her name is already written out in full above the picture in the info box (for the article). What listing the year does is identify when the photo was taken. There’s no need for anything else. Kierzek (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
