Talk:George Reisman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

As you can see, I tried to add a little stub here, but don't really know what conventions to follow in terms of (a) what to call the links area, and (b) how to fix the ISBN link.


When was Mr. Reisman born?

1935; I was just about to add it. Source: http://dev.mises.org/journals/scholar/cobin2.pdf, p. 1. --zenohockey 03:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prof. Reisman was born on 01/13/37. TRakowski 01:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the word "massive" in front of 1,050-page volume. If that is massive, then the number should be sufficient to inform the reader. 69.137.181.88 04:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Adam Pierce[reply]


Beyond the fact that it lacks a citation, the passage: "the contents of which are mostly subsumed in his lengthy treatise" is subjective/editorial & as written, attempts to achieve an overtly dismissive tone. Is it not enough to say the two influential figures endorsed his work? Wiki truth enlighten (talk) 18:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Reisman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]