Talk:New Age Ancient Near East Chronology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It seems this page is more about alternative ideas about sea-people than anything to do with New Age Ancient Near East Chronologies. I don't know if Velikovsky (it was not Rohl's idea), nor Rohl for that matter, can really be classified as New-Age or rather simply non-conventional or at worst anti-establishment. How about filling this page out a bit with some more really zany ideas which are in existence out there concerning middle-eastern chronologies for example the Alien origin theories.


from VfD

  • New Age Ancient Near East Chronology -- The body of the article is unrelated to the title and the rest is demeaning in Kenneth Kitchen-ite style thus neither is is NPOV. Any useful relevant info can be moved to relevant pagest such as Sea Peoples and Phoenicians while the rest is already said in a much more objective & detailed manner on the David Rohl page. Zestauferov 08:29, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)
    • It at least needs some serious NPOV work. I'm not familiar enough with the content to be able to tell if it's total bunk. moink 20:33, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)
    • I've redirected it for now and listed it on Wikipedia:Cleanup so if anyone wants to NPOV it and sort it out they unredirect it and deal with it. Angela. 05:57, Jan 4, 2004 (UTC)