Talk:Jia Qinglin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I moved this from Jia Qingli. See http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/data/people/jiaqinglin.shtml. --Jiang 00:39 7 Jul 2003 (UTC)



About the really political role of Jia[edit]

In reality,he is the fourth ranking member of the Poliburo Standing Committee,and he's also the leader of People's Political Consultative Conference which is largely ceremonial in nature.I don't know by which way he can perform his real power as the forth ranking man?Only through his presence and co-solving the political work of the Poliburo Standing Committee?

Can anyone show me the answers? Thanks, --Redflowers 05:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]



Xiamen smuggling cases[edit]

"Jia was pivotal in dealing with the Xiamen smuggling cases in the late 1990's as the Party Chief in Fujian."

Can anyone show me somemore detail about this problem?How was Jin alleged accused? Thanks, --Redflowers 05:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


See the following for more information:

Fewsmith, Joseph (2001): China since Tiananmen. The politics of transition (= Cambridge modern China series), Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 223-226. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.35.179.227 (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Is he corrupt? And does he spend party dollars in overseas entertainment complexes such as those in Australia? 49.229.115.25 (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indicted for Genocide[edit]

If an official has been indicted for Genocide, I see no reason why that information and the number of other officials also indicted for Genocide in the same case shouldn't be included in their article.Aaabbb11 (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The FLG spammed lawsuits everywhere, and a judge in Spain with absolutely no jurisdiction picked it up. This is inappropriate content as per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP policies. Simonm223 (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i thought that it would not only be bo xilai. can you explain precisely how this information violates either of those policies? simply 1) dismissing the material because the judge has no jurisdiction over China, and 2) referring to the policies, does not therefore mean that the material violates those policies. thanksHappy monsoon day 03:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Wu_Guanzheng my objections to all of the "five officials" having this piece of trivia is clarified there. Simonm223 (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive220#Is_mentioning_indictments_for_genocide_a_form_of_victimization.3F Aaabbb11 (talk) 08:19, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]