User talk:Alberto Orlandini

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Alberto Orlandini and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Hello, sonata-form movement always return to the tonic key. So by the rules, the exposition of C-G will be recapitulated as C-C. If there are three themes as you say C-G-G would normally be recapped C-C-C. In some ways a C-G-C recap is interesting and could be noted as a modulation to the dominant within the recap, but its misleading to refer to the final C as the subdominant because C major is the final tonic destination for the entire sonata movement. There's probably essays on the form used here somewhere in the literature that we could cite. Cheers.--DavidRF (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart[edit]

Thanks for adding significantly on the Mozart Requiem! Do you also have influence sources for his Great Mass in C Minor? And could you add one or the other inline reference for statements with "some say", specifying who said what when? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:00, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:PeriodT.gif[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:PeriodT.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Position of the Sun[edit]

Please review the "External links" guideline. In particular, the "Advertising and conflicts of interest" section indicates a person should not link to a site he or she controls. Also, the difficulty of understanding the site combined with the simplistic output makes the site of limited value; anyone who can understand the inputs probably already knows what the output will look like. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for not blocking me, my edits were in good faith and I did not mean do to disruptive editing at all. I'm sorry you undid my editings because you classified them as conflict of interest or advertising. I have no interest, no revenue, nothing at all from linking my javascript app, I just thought it could be useful for some Wikipedia users, that's why I linked it. I know experienced people probably already know the output, but my external link was not meant for experienced people. I did not find any other app displaying sun and moon together and with the labels of the hours, so I thought it could be useful. Maybe it is simplicistic but it is very accurate (tested by myself) and comfortable for time zone and daylight saving time offset. As you can see there is no advertising at all [1] That said, I don't think I violated the policy about advertisement or conflict of interest linking my app on wikipedia, but if I did, I would at least let some editor decide, as the policy [External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest] say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Orlandini (talkcontribs) 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Position of the Sun, you may be blocked from editing. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for not blocking me, my edits were in good faith and I did not mean do to disruptive editing at all. I'm sorry you undid my editings because you classified them as conflict of interest or advertising. I have no interest, no revenue, nothing at all from linking my javascript app, I just thought it could be useful for some Wikipedia users, that's why I linked it. I know experienced people probably already know the output, but my external link was not meant for experienced people. I did not find any other app displaying sun and moon together and with the labels of the hours, so I thought it could be useful. Maybe it is simplicistic but it is very accurate (tested by myself) and comfortable for time zone and daylight saving time offset. As you can see there is no advertising at all [2] That said, I don't think I violated the policy about advertisement or conflict of interest linking my app on wikipedia, but if I did, I would at least let some editor decide, as the policy [External_links#Advertising_and_conflicts_of_interest] say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Orlandini (talkcontribs) 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]