Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magical Pokémon Journey (0th nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 16:55, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)

Magical Pokémon Journey

Encyclopedic? Is it not? [1] Is Google a fair and unbiased barometer? --GRider\^talk 16:58, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Ok, if you spell it that way it gets just 15 hits, but with a normal "e" it gets 5,400 Google Hits Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:04, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Encyclopedic, fits in with the existing manga articles. Xezbeth 17:28, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep series of mangas, especially ones from a major franchise like this one. Kappa 22:22, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopaedic, pokecruft. Megan1967 06:49, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep in light of evidence presented by User:Starblind. —RaD Man (talk) 07:17, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Irrelevant, unencyclopaedic. 80.255 10:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. *points to Starblind's vote* Ketsuban
• Delete or merge into pokemon. I fail to see how this is anything short of promotion, or a mini cast profile for a Manga. Srcastic 07:20, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, hurt as it does to say so - David Gerard 12:09, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.