Talk:Harbour porpoise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hunting[edit]

That "Harbour Porpoises are not and never have been actively hunted by whalers" is incorrect, see for instance the German page on Harbour Porpoises. Stefan29 19:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Range[edit]

I think the Gulf of Bothnia should be removed from the range. The Archipelago Sea is the northernmost area in the Baltic Sea where harbour porpoises are normally found. I don't know about the Gulf of Finland, but I would be surprised if the range extends all the way to the bottom of the Gulf. --Chino (talk) 11:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Harbor Porpose Research[edit]

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20127004.400-oil-rigs-may-be-fit-for-porpoise.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.26.82.219 (talk) 04:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion[edit]

The use of the Dutch loan-translation[edit]

Mereswijn doesn't seem correct. The Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal gives various spelling of the word but Mereswijn isn't one of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Floris1978 (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hunted by Dolphins[edit]

Watch a documentary called The Dolphin Murders, seems dolphins actively murder the Harbor Porpoise for unknown reasons.101.103.172.182 (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The explanation that porpoises are being killed by dolphins due to competition for food does not stand up in my view. This would be an example of inter-species rivalry without precedent. Is there any evidence that they do actually prey on the same fish?

The alternative explanation [1] that dolphins exhibit infanticidal behaviour and that the porpoises are mistaken for juvenile dolphins seems more plausible. There is evidence that adult dolphins kill juveniles - see the reference article. John Muir (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Other possible explanations could be interspecies rivalry or even for fun or males letting off sexual aggression. We know that bottlenose dolphins can also be aggressive towards other dolphin species, such as Atlantic spotted dolphins, but porpoises being much smaller may be more likely to be killed by the interactions. Rlendog (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2016[edit]

In between the first sentence ("Harbour porpoises were... lighting fuel.") and current second sentence ("The drive...") of the Harbour porpoise#Conservation section please add the following:

Among others, hunting occurred in the Black Sea, off Normandy, in the Bay of Biscay, off Flanders, in the Little Belt strait, off Iceland, western Norway, in Puget Sound, Bay of Fundy and Gulf of Saint Lawrence.[2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ "Evidence for infanticide in bottlenose dolphins: an explanation for violent interactions with harbour porpoises?".
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference iucn was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Kinze, Carl C. "Marsvin i Danmark" (PDF). Hvaler.dk. Retrieved 22 October 2016.
  4. ^ Clark, John Grahame Douglas (1966). Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis. Stanford University Press. pp. 67–68. ISBN 9780416832402.

  • NB-1: The "iucn" citation [#1: <ref name="iucn"/>] is not defined here on the talk page, but it is already used and therefore defined in the article.
  • NB-2: I have deliberately not wiki-linked "Bay of Fundy" because it already is linked earlier in the article (i.e., it would be a WP:REPEATLINK). To avoid the same problem with repeat links, please remove the wiki-link from "Little Belt" in the current second sentence (third sentence after the above has been added; "The drive hunt in the Little Belt...") of the Conservation section.

80.62.116.249 (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done  Paine  u/c 10:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harbour porpoise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Harbour" or "Harbor"?[edit]

Both spellings (British and U.S., respectively) are used in this page: "harbour" 55 times (including the title), and "harbor" 11 times (including in the infobox). (In the porpoise page, "harbour" is used 33 times, and "harbor" 12 times.) Should there be one consistent spelling here (along with a note in (or near) the lead clarifying that the other spelling is also acceptable)? PatricKiwi (talk) 22:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a note, the other spelling can be presented as a common alternative, like at Theatre. CMD (talk) 02:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy section misnamed or missing content[edit]

The "taxonomy" section has no taxonomy in it. It is merely a discussion of vernacular names. I'm afraid to edit here, so someone else would have to fix it. DCDuring (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Corpse picture[edit]

The picture of the mutilated dead one could be removed. Its disturbing and serves no purpose. 2001:569:FBA9:DF00:505A:D6D2:C03C:7785 (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Marsouin has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29 § Marsouin until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]