Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crabstreetjournal
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:32, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Crabstreetjournal[edit]
Non-notable. I speedied at first, article was recreated, I thought better of speedying it a second time since in retrospect, it doesn't meet the speedy criteria. (Update: Page author has removed the VfD header from the article several times.) Bearcat 08:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Non-notable, delete. RickK 08:34, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
- No evidence of notability submitted; use of "we" indicates vanity. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 08:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, online magazine about land hermit crabs as pets? You want to do the what now? Inter 13:16, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. jni 14:44, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, too granular and fails "Wikipedia is not a web guide". But I happily added crabstreetjournal.com as an external link on hermit crab. Samaritan 14:47, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I like hermit crabs too, but their magazine doesn't get a wiki entry. Delete. DS 00:43, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 01:35, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep; a cursory glance suggests they've got a fair number of people associated here. Everyking 04:27, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.