Talk:Seabiscuit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleSeabiscuit is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 27, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2004Peer reviewReviewed
August 31, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
April 21, 2007Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Birth / Death[edit]

I was just curious -- we have Category:XXXX births and... does this belong? It's not typical that we have animal's births and deaths but since we do here do we add it? I just found that to be a humorous, yet legitimate question. gren 01:49, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)]

I've put his birth in under May 23 Events, with explanatory note Martyn Smith 16:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Is there some way to get rid of the vandalism at the top of this article? I know this article is a current featured article so it may be difficult.

What are you referring to??? Wahkeenah 03:47, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Maybe you meant the weird comment about the Germans, which someone else fixed. Here's a novel idea: How about FREEZING the articles they want to "feature", to keep the grubby paws of the Great Unwashed from tinkering with them. Wahkeenah 03:51, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

How did the biscuit die, and at an early age?

Seabiscuit died from a heart attack in his stall, at age 14 if I am not mistaken. thehappyanole 21:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

How much money is that?[edit]

Dollar amounts of race prizes from the 1930s are mentioned in the article. Are these in 1930s dollars, or in 2005 dollars? If someone knows, it'd be worth a mention. Under the assumption that they're 1930s dollars, it'd be nice to have parenthetical comments on the 2005 value, if someone knows how to do that. Zashaw 28 June 2005 05:34 (UTC)

Converting US dollar amounts to "current" dollar amounts can be done using this tool: Inflation Calculator 1800 - 2005 --Kellsboro Jack 03:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal[edit]

Sorry, the article was vandalised by 12.5.232.253, not 71.131.217.215Stephen 06:57, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions[edit]

I see the horse was only 14 when he died. That's young, what was the cause of death?

What is meant by a *bay* colt? Martyn Smith 16:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Follow the link next to colour in the info box it links to Bay (horse)--rogerd 18:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. Why did Wikipedia remove all the links to the Unofficial Thoroughbred Hall of Fame, including the one on this article, when this website was a reference for many horse racing related articles? It accused me of spamming by adding the link to Alydar, and now all mentions of the site are gone. Alydar was the first one I added myself, and I did so because the link was relevant, on topic, contained further information on the specific topic not provided in the article, and did not offer any products for sale. How are links selling baseball caps not spam, but a relevant link is?

I have long been interested in Seabiscuit's genetic legacy, especially his daughters, who would have inherited his X chromosome and therefor his "big heart". The article mentions 108 foals, of which only two were successful racehorses, and they appear to have been males. But what about his daughters and their progeny? Information about them would be welcome. Janice Vian, Ph.D. (talk) 03:15, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Nomination[edit]

Seabiscuit has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 15:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above, Seabiscuit died of a heart attack in his stall. Hope this helps! thehappyanole 21:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Seabiscuit.jpg[edit]

Image:Seabiscuit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


Save_Us_229 21:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did my best to edit this page and remove any inaccurate information. Also, I was curious as to why the photo of Seabiscuit was of someone standing by his statue. . . Is it possible to locate a new photo for this article, that portrays the horse? Thanks so much! thehappyanole 21:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The statue was all I could find in Commons, most images of Seabiscuit are subject to copyright--as was noted in the 2007 discussion above. If you can find something better, no problem, the statue can move elsewhere in the article if a replacement image of the actual horse can be located. Montanabw(talk) 04:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tea's Over[edit]

The mare was called Tea's Over. see [1] Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

btw this article is far too light on citations for a B class. I think C would be generous considering it's tagged. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So much vandalism, easy to miss the correct edits. Sorry about that. No problem with you making the correction and fixing the classification. See also http://www.pedigreequery.com/seabiscuit if needed, though.

Notable race won section[edit]

Can't really see the point of this section. We have "major wins" in the infobox and a very detailed account of the horse's career. This seems redundant. The fact that he ran 89 times would be better in the lede. Tigerboy1966  08:05, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the 89 starts are cited, I agree the location and various distances are irrelevant, other than maybe the outer ranges, But the amount he raced IS kind of a big deal when you look at the short careers of modern US race horses. Also, considering he was a cull who was unbelievably over at the knees and looked like he should fall flat on his face, his relative soundness throughout his career was remarkable. Montanabw(talk) 18:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Potential (very) longstanding copyvio[edit]

Hey, all, I have concerns about the "Injury and return" section. I removed a brief section of copyvio from it, but I'm worried that the section as a whole is itself a copyvio. Its language is rather un-clinical, which I find to be at least a yellow flag for copyvio. The section has been this way since 2004(!), though, which makes it difficult to actually judge this. The possible source for this text is http://levota.com/-.html, dated 1999, but I can't verify whether that page actually predates the wiki article; the earliest Wayback Machine entry for the levota site is 2008, which is inconclusive. Nevertheless, I'm suspicious; the article's language doesn't *exactly* match the source's, even back when it was first inserted (while still being far far too close paraphrasing): slightly changing the text is something I would expect from a copying *to* Wikipedia, not a copying *from* Wikipedia.

What can be done here? I understand that this is all ancient history, but I don't think there's any (metaphorical) statute of limitations on copyvio. Thoughts? 216.113.160.71 (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt a family blog was the original source, they probably copied from Wikipedia, that happens a lot. Montanabw(talk) 04:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Seabiscuit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The film is a truckload of Disneyfied bullcrap. As is "Secretariat". "National Velvet" is about as realistic. For further details, contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.165.242 (talk) 08:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Early death[edit]

Any chance of expanding that section. I think it’s quite notable Seabiscuit died so young. For example Man O’War lived till 30. A good age for a horse with an average lifespan of 25-30 years.

Cynically was doping rife at this time in racing? It just seems such a young age for a healthy horse to die. 86.148.81.72 (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DNA[edit]

Just leaving this here for now [2].  Tigerboy1966  15:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Betteridge's law of headlines zchrykng (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]