Talk:69 (sex position)

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:69 (sex position)/List of pop culture references to the 69 sex position was copied or moved into 69 (sex position) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Archive 1

Image[edit]

Wikipedia is open to the general public, which includes all ages. Wouldn't it make more sense to remove a picture and this inappropriate article by extension? One: this picture is too unacceptable. Two: did it have to be ion color? Couldn't they have used a black-and-white image with such low quality that nobody can understand what's going on? Three: encyclopedias don't normally have pictures. I mean, this is just too much. Pictures of guillotines are fine because they aren't in use. But this? Come on, Wikipedia admins, did you have to allow this picture? If you must keep it, at least replace it with an image what makes it harder to tell what is going on.Primal Groudon (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Primal Groudon, see WP:Not censored and [[WP:Offensive material]. Wikipedia isn't like typical encyclopedias. The drawing is an illustration instead of a real-life image and therefore takes into consideration what WP:Offensive material states about going with the less offensive image. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But still, the image violates North Korean law. Primal Groudon (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you're one of the Kim family, no one in North Korea has internet. MightyArms (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

69 Le Parfum {{In 2012 the performer/ perfumer Christopher DiCas, creates with music, a perfume with the name of this position due to the unexpected and uncontrollable eroticism that provocatively radiated and so 69, became the scent with which both sexes are equated erotically; 69 caused mainly because of its name the rage of some conservative societies, and many bad reviews were written before it was even tested. Today it is considered as the elixir that aims to stimulate the relationship and communication of couples for a deeper connection in a modern society that imposes superficiality in all areas.}}

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.