User talk:Aesed

Reconquista timeline map[edit]

Hi,

I found your map awesome while comparing FR and EN interwikis.

I intended to upload it in commons, but {{fairuse}} seems not allowed there. Do you have more accurate info about the use of this map ?

(same name Image:Alandalusmap.jpg).

Your message in your homepage involves Historiography. I like that subject too !

Have a good day,

Holycharly 12:16, 25 August 2005 (UTC) (al-Andalus project, Wikipédia FR)[reply]

Muslims in the Iberian Peninsula[edit]

Not only the majority argued for the move, they were also the only ones to give arguments.

Image Tagging Image:AlAndalusmap 1248.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlAndalusmap 1248.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Arnie587 02:22, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What gives?[edit]

Firstly, quit your hysterical ranting, Moving a page to a better title is not vandalism, and that is a ridiculous assertion. Secondly, at no point was there a Muslim rule or occupation of "The Iberian Penninsula", rather of part of it, so the title you are trying to enforce is factually inaccurate. Thirdly, for reasons you are aware of, but choose to ignore, that is not a timeline but a Chronology. Fourthly, fix the DRD's you've made. --Irishpunktom\^talk 22:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MuslimOccupation.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MuslimOccupation.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Joanot Martorell ✉ 09:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Iberia 1150.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Iberia 1150.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Iberia_1300.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Iberia_1300.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:MuslimOccupation.jpg[edit]

Are you a noted catrographer? Becuase an ordinary person cannot make a map like that? If you did make it, what historical sources did you use to justify demarking where you did? Making it with no sources does not make it reliable. So, please add what sources you used. The base map and whatever historical date for overlaying onto the map of the Iberain peninsula. Thank you gren グレン 06:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added no source to it... because frankly... you didn't make all of that with no aids for creation. Justify that it's in the public domain or it should be deleted. It may very well be fair use or if you can find the blank map and tell us what sources you used to make the information then do so... but, there needs to be some reasoning. gren グレン 06:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove the tag again without some explanation to what I have said above. gren グレン 05:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This goes for Image:Iberia 1150.gif and Image:Iberia 1300.gif as well. gren グレン 05:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've put them up on WP:PUI. Feel free to make a comment there but, do not remove the tags from the images until the time on PUI is up. That would be considered vandalism. gren グレン 04:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, that map isn't a template for the final version... they are very different. Also, where did you get the historical data with which to draw the definitive lines you did? That's very important to assure you are accurrate... we've been called the "faith based encyclopedia" but we'd rather not stay that way. Your licensing tags remain and I think the PUI tag will be taken down after it has been up there for 14 days... You have to admit it all looks a little fishy. Mapping is not easy... not if you care about accuracy and making an 19th century or so map into a nice small straight lined map with transparency is not so simple. I mean, look at the detail on the coast lines in the map you says is your source and then look at your version... why would you get rid of all of that? It makes no sense. gren グレン 22:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, doesn't your 1150 differ from the source map? Why don't we just use the Texas map or work to produce a version of that which looks nicer. Yours seems to differ from that without giving other sources... which is the main thing that is bothering me now. gren グレン 22:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did tell you... but... don't remove the PUI... it is like AfD... it stays up there for a certain number of days. So, you can't jsut remove them... if nothing happens on PUI after a certain number of days (14 I think) they will automatically be removed... okay? So, please don't remove them. It doesn't mean that they will be deleted or anything. Thanks. gren グレン

The image was deleted on WP:PUI by another admin because you did not justify that it was free. Then you re-uploaded it. You can go to deletion review if you have an issue with the decision from PUI but don't just ignore the decision. If I had arbitrarily deleted it, this would be different, but I did not delete it in the first place. So, you are blocked for 48 hours. Please do not do that again. gren グレン 23:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MedievalIberianPeninsula.jpg was a slightly modified version of the image [:Image:MuslimOccupation.jpg]] which had been deleted under PUI. When you re-uploaded it I told you not to try to circumvent the system. This is doing the same thing so I have blocked you for a week (feel free to appeal it or explain why you did this). The whole point of this has been that you must give sources for historical images. You did not just pull the history and exact borders from Medieval Iberia out of your head... they came from somewhere or, the image has no value because you did randomly pull them out of your head. Borders on maps cannot be considered common knowledge. The fact that you refuse to explain where all of the information comes from but still upload it is problematic and if you continue to do this you will be blocked for progressively longer periods. Please just stop it. gren グレン 01:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I felt bad so I unblocked you after 4 days. You knew that you shouldn't upload the same thing... because it was deleted as per PUI and reuploading the map with superficial changes was trying to circumvent that. I asked User:Briangotts where his map came from and he told me. I asked User:Salman01 where his material was coming from and he gave no claim that it wasn't copyrighted and re-posted it and was blocked. I am trying to be fair about this and I don't see it as trying to stop an encyclopedia from being created. I see it as trying to make this encyclopedia verifiable. We have to know what sources the borders came from because they shouldn't just come from thin air... and if they do... why should we trust the map as being correct? If you can give verifiable information about where data (borders, etc.) comes from and show that whatever copyright you give it is correct then it's fine. But you have to be able to show everything you used to make an image. That's verifiability and when amateurs like ourselves try to create an encyclopedia we need that verifiability to have any credibility... because we will not just be trusted like Britannica is. gren グレン 04:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Atienza.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Atienza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Vall de Gallinera[edit]

The article La Vall de Gallinera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
La Vall de Gallinera – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. Please see the plain-language summary of our notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.--HC PUNXKID 17:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]