Category talk:United Kingdom case law

Law Category‑class

	Law portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

United Kingdom Category‑class

	United Kingdom portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

All cases in the Special Issue of the Law Reports should be included here:

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Donoghue v Steveson R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 DC Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 HL(E) Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944] KB 718 CA Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corpn [1948] 1 KB 223 CA Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales v Attorney General [1972] Ch 73 CA American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 HL(E) Van Duyn v Home Office [1975] Ch 358 ECJ

-- Kaihsu 08:54, 2004 Jul 14 (UTC)

This category is rather misleading. The UK has at least three systems of law (England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland). Case law properly belongs to one system. Please subdivide. Gdr 22:03, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)

R. v.[edit]

Would it be better to sort "R. v. Name" category links as "Name, R. v." instead? Melchoir 21:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]