Talk:Madame Tussauds

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cluttered citations[edit]

The citations for the list of wax figures goes off the edge of my phone screen. Could it be resolved like this?

[1] Alduin2000 (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC) </ref>[reply]

Maybe, yes. But had you considered that these so-called citations don't really support much, or in some cases any, article content? See my thread "List of the wax figures" above. Sorry to drone on about this, but nobody seems to care very much. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean, perhaps the list as is could be moved to it's own list page and a smaller list of notable figures that are more easily kept control of and verified left here. What do you think? Alduin2000 (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a perfectly reasonable proposal. Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and done it. I've transferred tables from other pages for now but obviously there is no separate London page and other notable figures may be missing as of now. Alduin2000 (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, Alduin2000, I think that's a vast improvement. The sourcing for that main list can now be considered separately. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^

Singapore Branch[edit]

Why Catriona Gray is not included on the list of wax figure in Singapore column? Rogeliomnl24 (talk) 01:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's your source? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Branch column[edit]

Please remove Catriona Gray there, instead put in Singapore Branch column, thanks! Rogeliomnl24 (talk) 01:38, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's your source? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madame_Tussauds#List_of_wax_figures, let's delete this.[edit]

Hello, any watchers around?

I suggest we delete this part of the article. As the article states, there's no reasonable criteria. Odds are that anyone who has a waxfigure also has a WP-article. This is just WP:FANCRUFT, and can be handled with one or more categories instead. This info belongs on org websites.

Also... A separate column for Marvel? Please no. Not that I don't like Marvel. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added some Tussauds at Marvel:[1] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or just replace it with "Main article: List of wax figures displayed at Madame Tussauds museums" Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree 100%. I've been suggesting this for the past six years. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there's no opposition in the next 15 minutes we'll do it. ;-) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about 30 mins? Ha. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The link to the Main makes sense to me. Thanks for flagging this @Gråbergs Gråa Sång Star Mississippi 00:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's been 24h and participants are unanimous. I'm doing it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that Madame Tussauds and Donald Trump probably meets WP:GNG, [2]. Oy... Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Marvel_Cinematic_Universe#Marvel_at_Madame_Tussauds[edit]

Your view is welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Madame_Tussauds&oldid=1218588308"