Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Striving for Mediocrity

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:43, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Striving for Mediocrity[edit]

There's already discussion on the VfD pages about whether university newspapers are of encyclopedic value. A comic strip in a university newspaper is of even less encyclopedic value. Rick K 08:37, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

Delete, Not notable. Inter 11:25, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, comic strips are not inherently encyclopedic. Wyss 21:44, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable enough, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:55, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. College newspaper comic strips specifically are not inherently notable. In general, they run for about three years max, the artist graduates, and life goes on for artist and audience alike. — Gwalla | Talk 03:11, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Unless it's Doonesbury. :) RickK 05:27, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
  - Comment: Well, yeah, some do go on to greater things. But lets wait until they do before making articles for them. — Gwalla | Talk 06:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. ComCat.
Delete, nn. Edeans 05:39, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.