Talk:William Wegman (photographer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Photography: History C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Copyright?[edit]

This seems to be cut and pasted from here. Should it be? -- Wgsimon 22:34, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reverted to pre-copyvio version--Duk 17:37, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has added the old, apparently copyright, material again. I suspect the new image is copyright too. - Wgsimon 22:46, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

reverted to pre-copyvio version--Duk 00:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Info as of Feb 1996[edit]

This month, the late Fay's descendants--daughters Battina and Crooky, son Chundo, all 6 years old, and grandson Chip, 9 months--star in a new batch of shorts based on popular nursery rhymes.

Portland Dog Bowl[edit]

This article should include information on the aforementioned public art composition by William Wegman. Plenty of information is available online, will consider doing so myself. -Dennis Gutierrez digz81@gmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.111.69.230 (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Deodorant[edit]

I put information about the "Deodorant" sketch under Notable Facts. I think there is probably a better place for this information, feel free to move or delete it.

Fair use rationale for Image:William Wegman's Dressup Batty.jpg[edit]

Image:William Wegman's Dressup Batty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]