Talk:Hancock Place

Moving this from the article:
[Could we please see something in (or very near) the first sentence that says what Hancock Place is, and highlights that phrase?]

-- Zoe

I have never heard of anyone calling this building Hancock Place. Apparently neither has the author of the other article about this building, John Hancock building (which also discusses the John Hancock Center in Chicago and the original Hancock Building). 18.24.0.120 16:00, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Incidentally the original author's external article about this item has been corrected to say Hancock Tower. KeithTyler

---

This needs to be merged with John Hancock Tower. This article has a lot of problems, ranging from incorrect name of the building, to POV. Very little of this article should probably be used as merge material, then the rest left to be VfDed.

KeithTyler 22:47, May 27, 2004 (UTC)

From VfD:

Hancock Place

Redundant (with John Hancock Tower), and exceedingly editorialistic. What NPOV material there is has been merged into the other article. Furthermore the text already exists on an external site (a link to which has been added to the merged-into article). KeithTyler 04:36, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC) Oh, and maybe I should mention that the name is not an accurate one for the subject matter. KeithTyler 04:56, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC) (somehow this vfd entry got erased)

• Now redirected. Keep harmless redirect. Rossami 23:38, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
• Harmless redirect, keep. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:30, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion