Talk:Kuhn poker

Gambling: Poker Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Poker (assessed as Low-importance).

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Game theory Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Opening comment[edit]

Is it really as simple as this? I can't see myself ever betting without the top card... the game might be more interesting with blinds or antes, raises, and whatnot... Evercat 16:08, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, what does it mean to "win" the round when there's been no betting? No betting means no money means no "win"... :-) Evercat 16:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ante --Henrygb 11:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what is the winning strategy?[edit]

Would be great if the article could also outline this only winning strategy, instead of just stating the rules. --Pgallert (talk) 09:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So ....[edit]

Do the players understand the composition of the deck? Whether or not this factor is explained to them makes an enormous difference, as a player unaware that the only cards in the deck are J, Q, and K might be dealt K (unbeatable) and then incorrectly assume that the other player might hold an Ace, causing the player holding K to lose. Or have I completely missed the point? 74.131.53.1 (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have missed the point. The players understand the game, the deck and the rules. So there are obvious strategies: never fold with a King, and never call with a Jack. If you are sure your opponent understands that, then always raise second with a King and never raise second with a Queen. And so on. --86.178.49.216 (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]