Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old messages[edit]

In the picture showing this bridge at dusk it's hardly visible. Is there a good one showing it in daylight? Michael Hardy 18:43, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Watch a video detailing the life, death and rebirth of the Stone Arch Bridge by going to (uninformative link removed)

Minnesota Bound link[edit]

I removed the Minnesota Bound link (Stone Arch Bridge) because it did not seem to provide information that is substantially different from the other links. Please discuss if you feel otherwise. Bfx12a9 18:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I-35W bridge will return[edit]

May as well leave the I-35W bridge as the "next downstream bridge". It will be rebuilt in no time, on an encyclopedic scale. (SEWilco 04:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Design and Construction[edit]

I am thinking of adding a brief section focusing on the design and construction of the bridge. Any thoughts or suggestions? ip2864pd 19:54, 6 Nov 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. If you have some good, reliable sources, it could prove to be interesting and informative. I think I remember James J. Hill saying that building the bridge was the hardest thing he had to do. Here's a good article from a Great Northern Railway fan site. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. That was one of the sources I had considered using. Thanks for the input. ip2864pd 17:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.240.72 (talk) [reply]

History[edit]

I saw a great article about the history of Stone Arch and also found a timeline which would be good to add as well.Is it okay to make an edit? I'll cite my sources of course. Share your thoughts on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tweedledee82 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Organization[edit]

As I look at similar articles, the [Bridge in London]in particular, what stands out is the organization of the article. It flows nicely and looks markedly better than the layout offered here. Granted that article offers more information, but I think the organization here could still be modeled after that one (or others that are similar). Any thoughts or concerns? Thanks. ip2864pd 18:54 12 Nov 2013 (UTC)

I was also thing that the section about the Heritage Plaque probably belongs after the History section. Thoughts? Ip2864pd (talk) 01:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stone Arch Bridge (Minneapolis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040622223440/http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/bridges/csab1.html to http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/bridges/csab1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sequence -- not second to Eads (which wasn't first!)[edit]

This article currently claims the Stone Arch Bridge opened in 1883 and was the second across the Mississippi.

There were at least three other railroad bridges across the river open before that date: the 1856 Government Bridge at Davenport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Bridge the 1868 Dubuque Railway Bridge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubuque_Rail_Bridge the 1874 Eads Bridge at St Louis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eads_Bridge

I don't see a complete list at the moment, perhaps someone can find one and update this article and others that make similar misleading claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.128.142.233 (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]