User talk:MaXim

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. You might like to start by reading the tutorial and introducing yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk or on my talk page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) and you can preview your changes before you save using the show preview button. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal. I look forward to reading your great articles and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. :)

P.S. if you're interested, a bunch of us have got together at Wikipedia:Australian wikipedians' notice board in order to coordinate filling some of Wikipedia's holes in Australian topics - feel free to drop by sometime. Ambi 08:38, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Did you know has been updated[edit]

Hi there! I've just updated "Did you know". One of the articles you started is now on the front page in the "Did you know" section. Enjoy! [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 16:03, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Hitxtrapfss.jpg[edit]

What licence is Image:Hitxtrapfss.jpg which you uploaded licenced under? Somebody in the WWW 00:22, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I'm going to have to put this in the "Potentially unfree images" category if I can't find out what licence it's under. Somebody in the WWW 10:59, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sturt Highway images[edit]

You uploaded some images appearing on the Sturt Highway article and labeled them public domain; Specifically Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg and Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg. They seem to be copyright unless permission is sought. Did you seek permission? The disclaimer at http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/disclaimer.htm says they are copyright but can be used if permission first sought. They should not be tagged as PD - the photographer has not released them into the public domain. You need to confirm the licence or release them as copyright used with permission. The information page should assert when you sought permision and confirm it was granted. Non-free use tags can be found at Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags#General_non-free_licenses. I appreciate that image tagging has evolved significantly since you uploaded the image a year ago. My comments also apply to other similar images uploaded. Regards--A Y Arktos (Talk) 19:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PD images[edit]

Could you explain to me why you believe the image Image:Hitxtrapfss.jpg is public domain? - Ta bu shi da yu 09:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, I'm doing this in one hit as I hope to be able to put your excellent images onto Commons! Could I get the sources for the following:

I appreciate your time on this matter! - Ta bu shi da yu 10:04, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Hey,

Thanks for adding infoboxes to some cpu articles. Its nice to see infoboxed you make being accepted by others.

TheJosh 09:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 203.87.98.23 lifted.

Request handled by: Netsnipe ► 04:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Busway3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Busway3.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 10:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sturthighwayroute.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sturthighwayroute.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 19:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hoshizora no Spica.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hoshizora no Spica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yukari Tamura[edit]

I have a question, why did u revert back to the version before I listed the roles in alphabetical order?66.183.215.186 06:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kohaku no Uta Hitohira.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kohaku no Uta Hitohira.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hana-furi Tsukiyo to Koi-youbi.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hana-furi Tsukiyo to Koi-youbi.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:True Romance.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:True Romance.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Douwa Meikyuu.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Douwa Meikyuu.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baodai.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baodai.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chanueting 14:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Chanueting 14:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spiritual Garden.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Spiritual Garden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tenshi wa Hitomi no Naka ni.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tenshi wa Hitomi no Naka ni.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg your work?[edit]

Guy0307 (talk) 05:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/sa/gawler.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Gawler-Main North Rd1.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/sa/sthexpress.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Darlington-Southern Expressway.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/sa/sturt.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Sturt Hwy11.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hotkey.net.au/~krool/photos/sa/sefreeway.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Glen Osmond-Adelaide-Crafers Hwy4.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 03:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aozora ni Yureru Mitsugetsu no Kobune.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aozora ni Yureru Mitsugetsu no Kobune.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Beautiful Amulet.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Beautiful Amulet.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:15, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:M1 freeway.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:M1 freeway.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DDMP[edit]

Ahem. Were you the admin who deleted the main page? Sorry for bringing this up. But if you did, I suggest that you quit trying to hide it as WP:STOCKS has it. So just kindly put on your user page, if you did it:

This user has deleted the Main page.

.--121.7.203.206 (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Changinet.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Changinet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dukeshighway.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dukeshighway.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hoshizora no Spica.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hoshizora no Spica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kitto ieru.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kitto ieru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

propose merge from Adelaide–Crafers Highway to South Eastern Freeway[edit]

As a past editor of at least one of the articles, you may wish to comment at Talk:South Eastern Freeway#2015 Merge proposal for a new proposal to merge these two articles as it appears the government now considers it to be all one road. As there will be quite a bit of work, I decided to consult before being bold. --Scott Davis ^Talk 22:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Little Wish: Lyrical Step[edit]

The article Little Wish: Lyrical Step has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beautiful Amulet[edit]

The article Beautiful Amulet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nemurenu Yoru ni Tsukamaete.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nemurenu Yoru ni Tsukamaete.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebirth: Megami Tensei[edit]

The article Rebirth: Megami Tensei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebirth ~Megami Tensei~.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rebirth ~Megami Tensei~.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gin no Senritsu, Kioku no Mizuoto.[edit]

The article Gin no Senritsu, Kioku no Mizuoto. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Deosn't meet WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gin no Senritsu, Kioku no Mizuoto.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gin no Senritsu, Kioku no Mizuoto.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yumemizuki no Alice moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Yumemizuki no Alice, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spiritual Garden[edit]

The article Spiritual Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 05:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aozora ni Yureru Mitsugetsu no Kobune.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aozora ni Yureru Mitsugetsu no Kobune.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yumemizuki no Alice[edit]

Hello, MaXim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yumemizuki no Alice, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]