Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Ko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:13, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Lisa Ko[edit]
Looks like a vanity page - Kyle Kinney
- Delete, article does not establish notability. RickK 05:54, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Windup, please visit your talk page. EvilPhoenix
- Delete. Non-notable. Quale 07:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vanity. DoubleBlue (Talk) 14:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- author, User:Windup is probably Lisa Ko considering second Google result for "Lisa Ko" is wind-up.net. ✏ OvenFresh² 16:27, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If that's the case, and considering that it's the work of a newbie and that it's only just been suggested that she userfy the article, wouldn't it be better to give her a few days to respond before deleting it? Or perhaps, just move it to her user space and delete the resulting redirect? It's a few days since she did this, it may be a few more before she checks her messages here, and the VfD period seems a bit short for this. It's not an objectionable attempt at self-promotion, just a newbie. I recommend patience. No vote as yet. Andrewa 16:57, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- She has 5 days from the time of the VfD listing until the article gets deleted. That's plenty of time to move it to User space if she wants to. I'm sick and tired of all of the extremism that is dominating VfD lately. RickK 20:07, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Agree that she has 5 days to move it. Disagree, as I said above, that this is plenty of time in this case. Agree that extremism on VfD is not good, but surely, a comment (not even a vote) that we are rushing things a little here is not extremism? No vote still (doesn't seem necessary). Andrewa 16:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- She has 5 days from the time of the VfD listing until the article gets deleted. That's plenty of time to move it to User space if she wants to. I'm sick and tired of all of the extremism that is dominating VfD lately. RickK 20:07, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: If that's the case, and considering that it's the work of a newbie and that it's only just been suggested that she userfy the article, wouldn't it be better to give her a few days to respond before deleting it? Or perhaps, just move it to her user space and delete the resulting redirect? It's a few days since she did this, it may be a few more before she checks her messages here, and the VfD period seems a bit short for this. It's not an objectionable attempt at self-promotion, just a newbie. I recommend patience. No vote as yet. Andrewa 16:57, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wikipedia doesn't usually like autobiographies. Harro5 21:54, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It doesn't matter how nice Ms. Ko is, how accurate this information is, who wrote it, and what the writer's intentions were. It is not in any way encyclopaedic or notable.
- The above is by User:Ben-w. RickK 05:03, May 15, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.