Talk:Futura (typeface)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Random examples?[edit]

Futura is used in a rather lot of designs. Is it really sensible to add some random examples to this article?

-- I agree, the entire last paragraph is questionable. While interesting, we don't need pop-culture trivia to describe a font.

Dates[edit]

The date created in the article conflicts with the infobox - the former is 1928, the latter is 1927. 199.44.82.81 18:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link to Metro[edit]

"Metro" previously linked to Metro which is obviously wrong. The Metro Disambiguation page does not carry a link to a page on the Metro typeface, and I can not find any other reference to it on Wikipedia. I have removed the link, but presumably we need a page for the Metro typeface ? Sadly I am not qualified to write it. GeraldH 15:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake in Image: "Erinnerrung"?[edit]

I'm referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:FuturaSP.png

I assume the example "Erinnerrung" is the german word "Erinnerung" or is the mistake intentionally? 87.234.84.80 01:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In making specimens I use word culturaly related to the place and time the typeface> The word originates on a promotional piece that Renner designed for Futura. I may have included a typo. I will check my source when I get to my office, and fix the specimen. CApitol3 12:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh? So much work and thought went into this? Then, if I may suggest another word: Aufschwung. Because, from what I gather, remembering what happened the years before was the last thing people wanted in the 50s and it was all about the Wirtschaftswunder. Plus, it is called Futura after all and not Praeterita. On the other hand Erinnerung is a serious political statement under these circumstances. Just a thought. (also, i put a line between your answer and my first post) 87.234.84.80 03:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Reform party logo.gif[edit]

The image Image:Reform party logo.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Usage[edit]

The "usage" section was getting out of hand. If a typeface is relatively uncommon and/or uniquely associated with a particular brand (i.e., Exocet with Tazo Tea), then it makes sense to list one or two common usages... but there must be millions of books/magazines/catalogs/logos etc. using Futura. Listing them is a fool's errand. If somebody wants to argue for a particular usage being significant, do it here first. Of all the examples we had, I think only the moon plaque is worth listing (and that wasn't even in the text, just in that photo caption).—Chowbok 17:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wes Anderson's use of the font may be worth noting, in that he uses it as a stylistic signature or trademark in his films. Like Woody Allen's use of Windsor, Anderson's use of Futura is such that you can practically identify the filmmaker by the opening credit - he makes it his own. Thoughts?--66.65.3.123 (talk) 19:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Ditto Stanley Kubrick. --66.65.3.123 (talk) 19:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what's so special about Anderson or Kubrick's usage of the font that distinguishes it from the millions of other uses.—Chowbok 19:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


It is an extremely culturally significant example of its usage; regardless, there is no logical reason to EXCLUDE examples of its usage on the basis that "listing them is a fool's errand". Such information is still TRUE and HELPFUL to someone looking into information about this font. Why fight this so much? nhakimi 20:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm with Chowbok on this. The problem with "Futura was also used by X in the video for Y / Futura was used in an episode of Futurama with the robot / it appears on Neil Peart's drums on the cover of X" is that such lists quickly become huge, unmaintainable, and uninformative. It's interesting to know that the font was used in a lot of science fiction films - including 2001,[1] Space: 1999[2] etc - as visual shorthand for modernism, but eventually we reach a point where the interesting and significant uses are absolutely buried by trivial appearances in the background of whatever is popular on US cable television. There's a subculture of Wikipedia editors who sit in front of their televisions just waiting to spot something that they can add to their favourite waste of time, and that subculture needs to be politely moved away from Wikipedia towards TV Tropes, where it has finally found happiness. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was the official font of the apollo space project according to http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/08/entertainment_knowledge_of_all_fonts/html/2.stm Alex-thong (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this one? Futura is used by the Afro-pop/Indie band Vampire Weekend on all their album covers. It was also references in their song "Holiday" ("She'd never seen the word bombs/blown up to 96-point Futura"). Just a thought. Torma616 (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Animax Asia is also currently using the Futura —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.139.49 (talk) 14:57, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think this section is a little bit messy right now. I disagree that a list will be unmaintainable because it can easily be logically reorganized. Removing words like "Futura was used..." would lighten the reading load, and make it easier to scan. Anyway, I just wanted to provide another use of the font: Toronto subway stations - specifically to denote the name of the station, in tile, on the walls of the platforms. 24.212.181.43 (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A comment told me to bring this up first, so:[edit]

According to an article by Jon Ronson in the Guardian, based on his access to Stanley Kubrick's estate and close collaborators, Futura Extra Bold was Kubrick's favorite typeface. He used it in the title sequences for 2001 and Eyes Wide Shut. I would have just put that in under "usage" but somebody apparently was worried about the section ballooning with trivia. I think it's suitable. 69.159.87.132 (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Usage[edit]

So the font is used on both vampire weekend albums and you should list it under usage. Vampire Weekend (album), Contra (album) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.75.54.249 (talk) 02:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about mentioning Pratt Institute, which uses the ultra-bold version of the typeface in cadmium yellow as its official logo? Peace. —MuzikJunky (talk) 04:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Font is the Offical Font Type Used by New Zealand Customs Service. [1] see their logo sports the classic geometric font but all their brocures and media products are produced using the font type Futura. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.198.207.59 (talk) 00:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

BBC1 Ident[edit]

Instantly recognisable to anybody in the UK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BBC1_1970%27s.png I think this merits being included in the Usage section, given how familiar it is, and belonging to a state boradcaster's main channel identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.145.92.119 (talk) 05:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding more usages[edit]

Futura is seeing very widespread use in recent films/games, I thought it wise to add the most popular examples to the article.

Samcooke343 (talk) 12:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm bringing it up here due to the note on the main article:

Futura is used on a lot of classic lab equipment. I ran across it when trying to find out what fonts showed up in the bottle and equipment labels in old educational science films.

One notable use is by Moog synthesizers. They were the first real synthesizers and still a very popular US-based brand. Moog synths use Futura, Futura Bold, and Futura Condensed on their front panels. Examples include the Minimoog Voyager. Much like classic lab equipment labels, Moog tends to use only capital letters in the panel labels. 71.127.157.90 (talk) 03:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Futura is used in 2016 film Captain America: Civil War Location cards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atulvi (talkcontribs) 05:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Was this font used in the 2009 A-ha band logo, or was a different font used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude00007 (talkcontribs) 19:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, forgot to sign. Dude00007, Ph. D. (talk) 04:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Samples needed[edit]

...for all the alternative versions: Black, Display, Condensed, Steile, ND, ParaType, Bukra. -- Beland (talk) 21:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC) Beland[reply]

[edit]

I hate Googles new logo it uses Futura and it doesn't look playful--Buggi — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuggyIsBack (talkcontribs) 04:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futura (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futura (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Futura (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Futura (typeface). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]