Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loizidou vs Turkey

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP and CLEANUP. —Korath (Talk) 03:24, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Loizidou vs Turkey[edit]

Is this article worth??? --Neigel von Teighen 21:36, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Should be merged into the main article on the Cyprus conflict. Also deserves a /notenglish/ tag because it's in legalese. Radiant! 22:25, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
Since it does actually seem to be a precedent-setting case, a better-worded version of the info should be kept somewhere. Cyprus dispute is currently 30K, but could probably hold it. Keep/cleanup or merge. Niteowlneils 22:33, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Meant to mention the first paragraph appears to be a copyvio from [1]. Niteowlneils 22:38, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Keep, cleanup and expand. It's a notable court case. Cyprus dispute article is already to large to merge with. Megan1967 05:55, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Articles on high-profile court cases are ok, but this needs sending to cleanup. It's unfortunate the author didn't have much to say about it and just inserted a State Department quote verbatim. We could do with some context and analysis. Trilobite (Talk) 10:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep. As with cleanup and expand. Notable and worthy enough to be in its own article. --Andylkl 08:57, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
Keep Darwinek 13:45, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.