Talk:Power Pack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Power Pack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Alex Power was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 May 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Power Pack. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

The article Katie Power was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 30 September 2023 with a consensus to merge the content into Power Pack. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Power Pack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Power Pack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article overlap[edit]

A lot of the information covered in the kids' individual articles appears to also be covered here. I think it might be advisable to redirect/selectively merge their pages to this article. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 05:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion with Alex Power[edit]

Quick history:

June 2018: User:Namenamenamenamename boldly redirected Alex Power to this article with the edit summary "content covered here is covered on Power Pack page as well"
May 3, 2019: User:Bearbro123 restored the page without an edit summary
May 8, 2019: User:ferret reverted Bearbro with the edit summary "Restore redirect, no reason for restore given, no improvements"
May 8, 2019: User:Jhenderson777 restored the page with the summary "agree to disagree. I feel like if one Power Pack character is merged then all of them should be which aren’t."
May 8, 2019: User:Drmies reverted JHenderson saying "feelings are great, but on Wikipedia we prefer arguments"
May 8, 2019: JHenderson restored, then self-reverted to avoid 3RR. He said "That is a lousy and uncivilized excuse. Also if you actually use google then you would know he is indeed notable enough for inclusion. Also he if he is a redirect he does not belong on Power Pack"
May 9, 2019: JHenderson asked for opinions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Alex Power notability. He indicated Alex was the most notable member of the team, and that 1) the other members should be discussed as well and 2) he doesn't feel Power Pack is the right target for the character if a merge/redirect is done.
May 9, 2019: I restored the page and put up merge templates so we could discuss the merger/redirect. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting Bearbro123, who has been disruptively un-redirecting many non-notable character and film articles for a while now while refusing to communicate. I left him a final warning at the same time. I would note that Alex Power contains not a single reliable secondary source. Unless that can be addressed, the article should be returned to a redirect. -- ferret (talk) 12:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additional context. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One final note, I have no strong opinion on WHERE to redirect it. The list of marvel comics characters would work too. -- ferret (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose redirecting Alex Power to this target. The character has experienced significant development outside of the Power Pack team. He meets my criteria for an entry at List of Marvel Comics characters: P. Any content forking should be removed or trimmed from this article. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not a single secondary source: for every Wikipedia article outside of superhero stuff that means non-notability and thus deletion. Merge it. Drmies (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- do you have an opinion on the ideal target? Argento Surfer (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - I will gladly leave that to the experts. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - no indication that Alex Power is independently notable; neutral on the target. Frankly I'd have preferred this to be an AfD rather than merge discussion because formalized consensus there would be binding in a way few merge discussions are. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Drmies (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And it seems like someone else agrees with me since they started an AfD here. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]