Odd how there's a signature at the bottom like you might find in an old print encyclopedia or magazine. This may be a legitimate group, but this smells like a copyvio. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 00:12, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvio, needs translation and NPOV work. Naahh.. Delete. SWAdair | Talk 00:36, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I would be willing to do the translation if it weren't probably a copyright violation. But since it probably is, it's not worth anyone's time. Just delete. I'm not up to doing any research to see if they really exist and are notable, either. If anyone wants, after it's deleted I could write a stub based on the source. Just drop me a note on my talk page to request. Isomorphic 05:28, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
The party itself is quite legitimate, but the page itself is a definate copyvio, lifted directly from the party website's history page. And furthermore, its pretty NPOV as well. Rhymeless 21:23, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
I think you mean "POV". NPOV means "Neutral Point of View", which is the desired state of an article on Wikipedia. "POV" is Wikipedia slang for "Point of view" meaning written from an obvious and biased perspective. Isomorphic 01:41, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, used to student editing in class, where "NPOV" means the opposite. Rhymeless 03:15, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
