User talk:Slawojarek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Slawojarek, welcome to Wikipedia. Good work on John Paul II International Airport. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela. 20:46, 17 Sep 2003

Awesome job translating! -- Tjdw 15:38, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Mariavite Church[edit]

Sure, I'll have a look later today or maybe tomorrow. Happy new year. Angela. 14:15, 31 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Wow, you've certainly put a lot of work into the Mariavite Church article. I've made a few small changes, but there were some things where I wasn't sure what you meant:

  1. You wrote "the turn of the 19th and 20th century". How can it be at the turn of both? The turn of the 20th century would refer to the period around the year 2000. Is this what you meant?
  2. Was Capucin monch meant to be Capuchin monk?
  3. What do you mean by cult when you say "spread the cult of God in Eucharist"?
  4. "First of the Mariavite Skolimowski" - what is Skolimowski?
  5. What does the word pyszny mean? You wrote "that was trying to do something on its own was perceived to be pyszny"

Angela. 18:16, 1 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I started Wikipedia:WikiProject Geography of Poland some time ago to settle the naming conventions for Polish Voivodships, powiats/counties and gmina/communes, as well as to create a set of infoboxes for use on these pages. Please participate. [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 12:46, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
Tabelka fajna, nawet bardzo. Brakuje mi w niej miejsca na mapkę, za to zlikwidowałbym pionową linię podziału między flagą a herbem. Tak poza tym - miodzio. Gratulacje! [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 11:53, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
Hmmm, on the second thought... Jest jedna rzecz którą można by usprawnić. Od jakiegoś czasu zastanawiam się nad totalnym wyczyszczeniem stron o polskich województwach na angielskiej wiki. Chodzi mi zwłaszcza o rozbicie jednego artykułu o sześciu województwach na sześć różnych artykułów. Myślę że można by było umieścić w tabelce jakąś pomoc nawigacyjną, przenoszącą pomiędzy artykułami o województwach o tej samej nazwie. Najłatwiej to załatwić albo za pomocą wpisywania linków w tabelkę, albo (co chyba jest łatwiejsze) za pomocą czegoś takiego jak szablon w szablonie (patrz użycie Template:Campaignbox Polish-Soviet War w Template:Battlebox; także Polish-Bolshevik War dla porównania). Co myślisz? [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 11:59, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
Tak, mniej więcej. Chodziło mi o rozdzielenie na przykład obecnego Pomeranian Voivodship od tego z XIII wieku. Podobnie za śląskim, krakowskim i całą masą innych.
Co do mapek - jeszcze nie wiem czy lepsza by była mapka orientacyjna (taka, jakich zrobiłem ostatnio multum dla wszystkich naszych województw, patrz choćby Masovian Voivodship) czy dokładniejsza z podziałem na powiaty (patrz: ibidem), czy wreszcie obie (tak jak to jest na przykład na niemieckiej wiki. Myślę że w tabelce chyba wystarczy ta pierwsza, z całym regionem zaznaczonym bez podziałów, a powiaty z oznaczeniami który jest który można zrobić niżej.
Co do wojewody - nie mam zdania. W sumie przy naszym systemie administracyjnym wojewoda jest równie ważny co sejmik czy inne tego typu organa - a wszystkich się nie da zamieścić. Podobne wątpliwości miałem przy robieniu Template:Infobox Poland: czy dodać prezydenta/burmistrza/wójta czy nie. W końcu dodałem i jakos nawet nie razi. Schody zaczną się po wyborach, gdy trzeba będzie to wszystko poprawić... [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 16:13, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
Aha, jeszcze jedno: nie wiesz może czy wiki akceptuje w tabelkach i szablonach frazy warunkowe, coś w stylu IF input=pomeranian THEN output=[[Pomeranian Voivodship|Pomeranian]]? To by znacznie usprawniło pracę i ułatwiło wstawianie szablonu... [[User:Halibutt|Halibutt]] 16:16, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)

I just started this and am looking to get some people involved. I noticed you've done some work on the subject, and your involvement would certainly be appreciated. Thanks! [[User:Sarge Baldy|Sarge Baldy]] 06:15, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)

Proposal: WikiProject Winter Sports[edit]

Hello and thanks for your contribution to the biathlon article! I hope to be able to recruit Wikipedians interested in winter sports such as biathlon and cross-country skiing to a joint effort in inputting the results of races in the current sports events -- for the time being, I am the only one doing this, and I would like to spread the work among more persons. :-) I also regularly update the World Cup top ten lists in biathlon and XC skiing for the current season.

Would you be interested in taking part in such a project? Know of any others? The writing as such should be no problem, one only needs to make varying modifications of my initial results lists. --Wernher 18:38, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

(please answer this comment right here, keeping the conversation in one place; I will check the page regularly)
(feel free to delete this notification, of course)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Ashgabat???[edit]

Hi. I don't know how often you visit the List of European cities with alternative names these days, but there has been a controversy on its talk page for the past ten days or so, and I was wondering if you would care to review it and possibly intervene. Thank you. Pasquale 18:14, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Alagaësia (pl)[edit]

I'm not too familiar with the Wiki projects and I was wondering if you could explain something to me. You added "pl:Alagaësia" to the article Alagaësia and I was just curious as to what it does. Thanks for the clarification. Aznph8playa 20:19, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah that makes sense. Thanks! Aznph8playa 21:46, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cubist house in Prague[edit]

Do you know who designed this house? If it was Josef Chochol, could you add this picture into this article as well? Thanks. Pavel Vozenilek 20:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pavel Vozenilek 16:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jarek,

The List of country names in various languages, List of European regions with alternative names, List of European cities with alternative names, List of European rivers with alternative names, and others, have come under attack by a certain Mikka, who, having just stumbled into all these lists, having found them of little use to himself, and having repeatedly ridiculed them and their users, has then promptly filed a petition to delete the lists in question.

Please cast your vote to keep these valuable, informative, and indeed fascinating lists at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of country names in various languages.

Thanks! Pasquale 16:17, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

You might want to know that there was a voting started at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Geography_of_Poland#Vote. Halibutt 00:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Église mariavite[edit]

Je dois vous faire remarquer que je ne suis que traducteur et me borne à mettre en français ce que j'ai sous les yeux. Quand j'aurai fini mon travail je le soumettrai à des wikipédiens plus compétents qui en discuteront, je vous préviendrai alors et vous pourrez leur donner votre avis. Amicalement. Gustave G. 05:17, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sucha_Beskidzka_county_coa.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sucha_Beskidzka_county_coa.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your Poland-related contributions[edit]

Hello Slawojarek! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  05:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Makow Podhalanski CoA.png[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Makow Podhalanski CoA.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sucha Beskidzka county coa.png[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sucha Beskidzka county coa.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sucha Makow Jordanow mapa.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]