Talk:Attribution

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

From VfD:

vfd'ed by User: Fennec on March 25, 2004 persumably for merge to copyright and/or intellectual property. Dont see the vote or discussion in the old archives. -Vina 22:32, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

  • It's certainly not a complete article. "Attribution" is an academic topic as well, and this is more of a dictdef than an article. I can't say it should be deleted, because it could be expanded into a massive article. All I can say is that it should be deleted if it is going to be a dictdef. Sorry for hemming and hawing: send to clean up with prejudicial return if not expanded. Geogre 02:29, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, I agree with Geogre, attribution has its place in wikipedia, but the article needs completion. I added the psychological meaning --Pgreenfinch 08:31, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • keep But change it from VfD to cleanup. This can become a valuable entry. KeyStroke
  • Move it to the Wikitionary -- kop 00:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, or redirect. Valid topic. Agree with keystroke.--Dittaeva 16:36, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

“Actually”[edit]

Please note that in this edit summary, I meant MOS:NOTED rather than WP:NOTED. A bit more about why I reverted: the problematic use of the word “actually” is that of correcting the reader, which is not the case here. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]