Talk:Louis Rossetto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

Viajero: Moving some of the details (and simply excising others) of Rossetto's history with Wired to the Wired page is like moving the bulk of Clinton's bio to the American history page. It does not help the reader, nor does it give an accurate view of the person. Also, links are good; this is the Web, and this is a story about a Web pioneer. Systematically removing links that were painstakingly added does not do the reader a service. The 6 October version was more useful and more accurate.

Re: Design[edit]

Wired was greatly admired for its bold design[2] and its coverage of "digital culture".

I'm sure that's true, but it seemed to copy and take the design of Mondo 2000 to another level, so it wasn't exactly a revolution but more of an assimilation. Granted, Mondo 2000 was quite primitive compared to Wired but when you compared the two at the inception of Wired, the influence was obvious. Viriditas (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Louis Rossetto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]