Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2004/07

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:66.159.173.217

vandalism modus operandi [1] Persistent vandalism to Maharaji (Prem Rawat). Anonymous user

User:130.18.249.109

User:Michael vandalism modus operandi [2] SkArcher 02:03, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

He inserts interwiki links? If that's vandalism, then I'm really in trouble. Guanaco 00:35, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Was he maybe inserting them to the wrong articles? That would be Michaely... Snowspinner 02:19, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
I screwed up the contrib link >_<. The user I was citing was doing things like changing a sentence from "the most human of the sciences" to "the least human of the sciences" - nothing to do with interwiki at all SkArcher 13:53, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:24.210.241.191

Has blanked the following:

  • 16:21, 29 Jun 2004 (hist) Point of No Return (top)
  • 16:21, 29 Jun 2004 (hist) Circumfix
  • 16:20, 29 Jun 2004 (hist) V-Speeds

And blanked and left gibberish messages at

  • 16:24, 29 Jun 2004 (hist) Talk:Microsoft - "(out of Date DON'T USE IT! IT WILL OVERLOAD YOUR COMPUTER!!!!)"
  • 16:23, 29 Jun 2004 (hist) Russell County, Kansas - "Never come here...it is EVIL!!!!! ............|\|3\/3|` (0/\/\3 h3|`3 /\g/\1|\|."

Contribs

User:161.53.121.6

User talk:161.53.121.6 special:contributions/161.53.121.6

special:contributions/193.198.128.197

special:contributions/193.198.140.68

special:contributions/193.198.144.102

special:contributions/193.198.144.79

special:contributions/193.198.145.40

special:contributions/193.198.129.170

special:contributions/193.198.138.46

persistent vandalism to Internet democracy. Anonymous user (also using IP's 193.198.140.68, 193.198.128.197, 193.198.144.102, 193.198.144.79, 193.198.145.40, 193.198.129.170 and 193.198.138.46) failed to win over anybody else in a large amount of discussion (now archived) on whether to include his content. He keeps coming back, removing the existing content, and replacing it with his own dubious version. Further, he is using abusive language toward anyone who restores the proper article text. I believe it would be prudent to place longer-term bans on his IP's. -- Stevietheman 16:31, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

He's spread over a good proportion of a class B, I'd have to block a /18 or so. Does anyone think that's justified? Pakaran. 00:02, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
No it's only the one article. I've protected intenet democracy which should deter him. theresa knott 13:35, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

203.166.96.234 203.166.96.235 203.166.96.236 203.166.96.237 203.166.96.238 203.166.96.239

Vandalism and copyvios from suite of Sydney? proxies. Listing here to group them. Expecting 203.166.96.240 to be next. --Zigger 15:11, 2004 Jun 29 (UTC)

  • This user is a serial vandal, having done the same thing before and is reverting my undoing of his edits, using the following modus operandi: E will vandalise minor pages (example:anna) which are less likely to be spotted quickly, and then make minor changes to busy pages to include links to the previously defaced page. Insidious little bugger, trying to avoid version reverts to his vandalism. See List of programming languages for evidence of ongoing nature of vandalism over a couple of days. SkArcher 15:23, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • 10:41, 29 Jun 2004, Pakaran blocked 203.166.96.232/29 (expires 10:41, 29 Dec 2004) (contribs) (unblock) (Pattern of vandalism) How's that? Pakaran. 15:42, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:CML

  • I believe he is also 24.19.14.88, whose only contributions have been vandalism of Darth Vader and a flame war in defense of Jeffrey T. Nomura on the VfD page. RickK's comments on CML's talk page imply this as well. Chris N. 10:33, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

216.46.128.148

213.137.118.36

Not-so-subtle vandalism. Puts blatant garbage on pages (like "blah blah blah" for quotes, and "Nikolic is a robot" for an article on Tomislav Nikolic. Seems to have something against Serbia, and its people. It looks like they stopped after I left a note on their talk page, but I'm adding them here just in case they strike again (with 'minor edit' checked). -Frazzydee 20:48, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

          • Hello, I am the 213.137.118.36. I live in Serbia, I am patriot, but I hate politicians.

That what I wrote was all i wanted to say and I will not do this anymore. 

 Regards,
        213.137.118.36 *****

128.12.168.58

Slightly subtle vandalism of Ron Jeremy, Will Smith and several others, introducing POV and bad data to the pages. SkArcher 03:17, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

68.77.14.186

Blanked List of Slovenians, List of Slovaks, List of Russians, and List of Croatians. -- Grunt (talk) 03:40, 2004 Jun 27 (UTC)

Can anyone tell me what happened to this page?

Ahmedabad the history page says that:

  1. cur) (last) 01:31, 11 May 2004 Kunjan1029
  2. (cur) (last) 05:18, 10 Jun 2004 Seems (Places of Interest)
  3. (cur) (last) 03:27, 3 Jun 2004 Kunjan1029 m (typo!)

notice how may is listed as more recent then june is this a bug ?? also how to restore a page from history?

--kunjan1029 22:22, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Not vandalism, so doesn't belong here. Definitely was some sort of bug, the page got REDIRECTed to itself. When I reverted to the 10 Jun version, the 11 May version in the history went away. RickK 22:29, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC)

sorry didnt know where this belonged. yeah i was reverting (learning) and u did it before me. ;) but i m glad i copied that page history coz it disappeared now. the reason i saw that page was because of this on my watchlist: N 07:31:26 Karnavati (diff; hist) . . Mkweise (Talk) (Karnavati moved to Ahmedabad) also could u move this to the bug page and let me know where it is on my talk page. --kunjan1029 22:34, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC) saw the page history for Ahmedabad I did move Karnavati to Ahmedabad coz it was incorrect. (cur) (last) 01:30, 11 May 2004 Kunjan1029 (moved karnavati back to ahmedabad see talk page for ahmedabad.) Definately a bug. notice how the time is different 1:30 when i did it and 1:31 what it shows in my post above... --kunjan1029 22:41, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

213.157.202.233

  • 213.157.202.233 (talk · contribs)
    An anon from Rustavi 2 Online in Georgia (likely former User:Levzur). Spamming Quantum mechanics and other science articles with text about Georgian scientists and their papers. I reverted, but he's likely to be back under different IP.Andris 02:24, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC)


62.246.66.212

More East/West Germany nonsense. Was already speedy deleted, now it's back as Westgermans in East germany. - Lucky 6.9 00:58, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)


User:80.193.174.2

This user vandalized the talk page of West Germany, this has occurred not long after User:195.166.69.189 vandalized the same page.

User:Michael

These entries are all likely the banned user:Michael. He edits from AOL, so blocking will not do any good. Deal with these by watching and reverting until he gives up.

Michael is creating user accounts like User:Hephaestos' father to harass User:Hephaestos and is making suspicious edits to music-related articles. Guanaco 21:05, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

You don't understand. Micheal DOESN'T GIVE UP until he is banned. RickK 05:51, Jun 26, 2004 (UTC)

Just out of curiousity, why doesn't AOL work for blocking? Forgive me for not knowing already. blankfaze | ?? | ?? 05:55, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

It doesn't not work, it's just if you block an AOL proxy, you disconvenience a lot of other AOL users as well. Dysprosia 05:58, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Ah. AOL users surf through proxies? I wasn't aware of this. blankfaze | ?? | ?? 06:21, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Yep. It's a rather stupid strategy to conserve external bandwidth. They have a 6 digit number of users per proxy, IIRC. Pakaran. 15:45, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:64.12.117.15

This, admittedly, is a strange entry. User has a long history of excellent contributions. However, someone at this IP just listed another one of those bizarre entries where the entry name matches the article. The latest: Operative art. The total content? "Operative art." - Lucky 6.9 06:09, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

64.12.116.135

User:205.188.116.*

This is likely Michael and the same as below. IPs include User:205.188.116.75 and User:205.188.116.7. Guanaco 20:19, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Michael is at it again. Revert all edits by these IPs. Guanaco 23:49, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:64.12.116.*

IPs used include User:64.12.116.195, User:64.12.116.77, User:64.12.116.141, User:64.12.116.82, User:64.12.116.8, User:64.12.116.11, User:64.12.116.69, User:64.12.116.65, User:64.12.116.19, User:64.12.116.6, User:64.12.116.9, and User:64.12.116.15. User has been adding tags such as Category:1988 albums to articles. Frequently adding two or more tags to one article, and tags are frequently wrong. Is, obviously, moving over multiple IPs so as to make it as difficult as possible to track and rollback. Snowspinner 16:19, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)

User:64.12.116.83 and other addresses in 64.12.*

Blanking random pages, especially User:Maximus Rex's talk and user pages. Knows that he/she/it is vandalizing (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:64.12.116.83&curid=639693&diff=0&oldid=0). Maybe User:CoolDude from below? Paullusmagnus 02:06, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

165.121.237.223

  • Here we go again. Another substub/title match. This time, it's the Plain of Ida. I give up. - Lucky 6.9 18:25, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)


65.103.23.249

  • Another bizarre substub: Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater. Title and content are the same, IP varies. I think we have us a bot since a couple of these have popped up on legitimate user histories. - Lucky 6.9 18:21, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Note: There is now a perfectly good stub article under this same title but by a different user. - Lucky 6.9 19:55, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

82.32.33.138

  • 82.32.33.138 (talk · contribs). Has created noncence, putting legitimate articles on VFD.
    • (note that this entry was added by the user themselves! Appears to be someone having a laugh theresa knott 15:32, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC))
    • I don't know why you feel the need to report yourself right after adding the VfD tage. I have reverted it per your report on yourself. - Tεxτurε 15:19, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

24.166.168.45, 65.31.249.58, 68.17.227.97, 68.8.184.246

I think we got linked to from LUE. Needs protection. They're just having a field day out there. All sorts of fun stuff has been added...*sigh* --PMC 08:04, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • Mirv just protected GameFAQs. Whew! What in the world is LUE? SWAdair | Talk 08:22, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • One of the GameFAQs forums. It's where a lot of the older accounts hang out. Some of them are rather immature, as shown by their vandalism of the article. (LUE stands for Life, the Universe and Everything, the official name of the board) Getting linked there is a lot like getting Slashdotted - you just know that pain is coming soon. PMC 08:33, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Fortunately none of them seem to have worked out that there are articles other than GameFAQ here. DJ Clayworth 17:37, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Meta

Many page moves under varying login names.--Patrick 05:28, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks to Brion, Jamesday, and Pakaran, this problem is now taken care of. Tomos 07:44, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

meta:User:198.26.123.36

Sorry to make an announcement here about the business on meta. But I just thought to let you know that there is clear ongoing vandalism by this, and another IP meta:User:80.132.24.9. If there is anyone who can take care of that, please do.

Tomos 04:27, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks to Brion, Jamesday, and Pakaran, this problem is now taken care of. Tomos 07:45, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:Openfly

I'm not sure if this is vandalism either, but we might want to be careful. Has two articles, Nyc2600 and Aboveten. They're both about hacker's groups. The first gets lots of Google and is listed for cleanup but the second is pure vanity and near nonsense. - Lucky 6.9 23:49, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:APatcher

  • APatcher (talk · contribs)
  • Not sure if it's really vandalism. User adds same webpage to some articles which has a lot of spam in it besides covering the specific topic. I'm unsure if his actions are ok, so I'm asking here. --Conti|✉ 21:46, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

195.29.142.65

Blanking portions of Yugoslav wars. -- Grunt 18:22, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)

216.75.131.198

Vandalising 1780, 1786, 1789. -- Grunt 14:35, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)

141.149.97.65

  • User:141.149.97.65 - added spam link which also tried to infect me computer with a trojan when I clicked on it. -- ALargeElk | Talk 10:55, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

192.115.62.132

  • (User:192.115.62.132 | talk | contributions) - Repeatedly spamming random articles with links to his business card company. Was warned a couple of weeks ago for spamming with links to an online casino. —Stormie 06:18, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)

User:Jaguar500ca@hotmail.com

More nearly legitimate titles with nothing more than the title being echoed in the article. The latest are Fundamental plane and as User:202.7.64.49, Stanley Gibbons catalog. - Lucky 6.9 05:34, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:Spleeman

Repeatedly deleting large amounts of information from Anarchism due to its failure to conform to his personal view of anarchism. Has violated the three revert rule, and continues to revert even after having this rule pointed out to him. Snowspinner 04:13, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)

User:Colinrorr

Author of the Danny Rosenblatt vanity page. Has reverted edits on the VfD page, is pleading "freedom of speech" and has duplicated his nonsense on Freedom of Expression. Please block now. - Lucky 6.9 01:11, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • He has also deleted various comments from posters when he did not like what had been said. I've had to revert on the talk page once and at least three times on Danny Rosenblatt. TheCustomOfLife 01:13, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I've blocked him for 24 hours, but he'll be back with the same nonsense. I deleted Freedom of Expression and Danny Rosenblatt, which was a redirect to FoE. Guanaco 01:31, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:83.109.151.10 and User:83.108.60.73

Created a nonsense article called Galendur and added nonsense. If they vandalise again, they should be blocked. --Lst27 21:38, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:80.203.81.21 seems like the same person. --Lst27 21:39, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

62.252.0.4

Vandalising European Union and AIDS myths and urban legends; now on last warning before a block. -- Grunt 14:47, 2004 Jun 23 (UTC)

User:212.85.5.92

Has made vandalism changes to London Borough of Croydon, Weapons of mass destruction , Plum , Monkey - all now reverted. Lumos3 12:55, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:209.240.205.63 and User:Freelanceresearch

  • Insists on slandering the critics of Sathya Sai Baba e.g. Skeptics "such as Premanand, 'a school drop out", "Tal Brooke who is an evangelical Christian sees himself as a 'false prophet and an 'Antichrist, as predicted in the Bible." "Hari Sampath's website, sathyasaivictims.com went down after a query was turned over to Illinois police regarding a report on an internet message board that Sampath was wanted in India for theft and sexual assault. Since then Sampath's high profile public appearance seems to have evaporated." This user is probably sincere but brainwashed. User threatens to sue Wikipedia if s/he is blocked. [3] Probably the same user as User:Freelanceresearch
  • Please block both. Andries 06:04, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)


User:69.40.127.62, User:24.218.135.223 and others

An anon with shifting proxies. The article is nothing more than an echo of the title. See D. Ray James Correctional Facility if it hasn't already been speed-deleted. There's been about a dozen of these today. - Lucky 6.9 21:35, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • Panzer Dragoon Saga is the latest. The titles almost make sense, but the low byte count gives them away. - Lucky 6.9 00:04, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:161.53.121.6

User talk:161.53.121.6 special:contributions/161.53.121.6 persistent vandalism to Internet democracy. Dunc_Harris|☺ 13:32, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • This user is also using abusive language against those who restore the article. -- Stevietheman 13:43, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

62.171.194.42

This IP has 22 edits going back to 2002, and all but about two of them are vandalism (random deletions and obscenities). I am tempted to block immediately, but the existence of occasional good edits makes me hesitate. -- Heron 09:09, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

My bust I got lost and spazzed. Sorry for the inconvenience WHEELER 16:56, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:24.228.82.146

Probably more of a pest than a vandal, he blanked a page up for Vfd then turned around and posted the text of the Zarqawi Letter. All 37K of it. - Lucky 6.9 23:33, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

194.125.165.120

User:MSW

(contribs) - Has reposted several deleted articles, some of them speed-deletes. All are about his/her neologistic fantasy world. - Lucky 6.9 06:25, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:212.138.47.*

(contribs) - Vandalism on Kris Aquino. -- Vesta 06:14, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:65.41.15.106

(contribs) - Vandalism on Allah. -- Vesta 03:12, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:216.154.130.39

(contribs) - Repeated vandalism on Mike Harris. -- Grunt 21:26, 2004 Jun 18 (UTC)

User:192.80.55.74

(contribs) - Adding very pessimistic POV edits to 128-bit era and List of video game consoles. -- Grunt 21:24, 2004 Jun 18 (UTC)


User:210.11.188.18

Vandalism on cell (biology). --Lexor|Talk 06:55, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

And many other places, incl. Wikipedia:Community Portal and Wikipedia:Current events. -- Grunt 01:29, 2004 Jun 23 (UTC)

User:162.83.199.229

Childish/sneaky vandalism of Dracula, George W. Bush and Circus (performing art). -- Kwekubo 21:07, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:66.87.145.165

This user (who has always used the same IP) as been vandalising International Star Registry repeatedly for about one month now, deleting every mention of criticism and essentially trying to turn the article into advertising. Also wrote on my talk page twice, first making vague threats, then trying to insult me, more or less.

I have protected International Star Registry for now, but of course, that can only be a temporary solution; I'd advocate blocking this user (especially since they never contributed anything useful), but I'd like to hear other's opinion on this first. A 24-hour block is unlikely to be effective since the user only seems to edit every couple of days at most. -- Schnee 20:05, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I banned the IP after more personal attacks on my talk page (and, in the process, unprotected International Star Registry again). If there's any objections to the ban, please discuss them here. Thank you! -- Schnee 14:12, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:66.2.146.237

Insists on vandalizing my home page and reverting edits to copyvio material he insists on posting. Proxy tends to change. Block the jerk. - Lucky 6.9 17:27, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)


user:Wik vandalbot

see Wikipedia:Vandalbot log entries, Wikipedia talk:Vandalbot log entries and user:Vandalbot

198.6.95.95

Vandalizing articles by adding Hillary's picture to Schnorrer and Devil Dogs. - Tεxτurε 20:13, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:203.164.20.11

Has vandalised Pornography and sex so far... and maybe others.

User:68.192.144.32 and User:Nika

Looks like Nika started where 68.192.144.32 left off, doing the same exact edits but in multiple pieces. Has anyone confirmed the source for these statistics?

I've blocked the IP for 30 days and User:Nika indefinitely. There's no reason we should tolerate this kind of vandalism. Guanaco 17:52, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:64.252.165.21

This is the latest proxy from the person who continually posts the useless entertainment-related substubs discussed further down the page. The modus operandi is the same each time, but they come in too slowly to be a bot. Once posted, the party never returns to flesh the stubs out, leaving a mess for others to clean up. Nor does he/she respond to any attempts at contact. I'm proposing an exception to the rules that any and all of these substubs be deleted on sight without delay. - Lucky 6.9 02:06, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I don't really see a problem here. Yes they're stubs (of the pathetic kind even) but it's valid information. The stubs will get fixed eventually. - Hephaestos|§ 02:09, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
With all due respect, I am convinced that this is more than a problem and is on its way to becoming an epidemic. The stubs are almost totally without content, virtually useless and other users are starting to become irritated by the whole affair as well. I can't see the logic in keeping these for the sake of simply having an entry...and not all of these get fixed. Several are still languishing and others aren't much more than wikified. The dinglefritz just drops these things and runs. It's like dealing with an idiot savant. - Lucky 6.9 07:19, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

195.144.131.10

193.219.132.150

210.54.22.243

This user added nonsense to Culture of the Maori. --Lst27 23:46, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

139.55.7.185

The user has only vandalized the Africa article once but made comments endorsing genocide (see:[4]), making comments such as "I'LL BE SO GLAD WHEN WHITES ARE OBLITERATED FROM THE PLANET AND THE WORLD IS ALL NON-WHITE." I think this qualifies for a hard ban if I've ever seen one, I can't do it because I'm not a sysop. Please do it as soon as possible. -JCarriker 06:12, Jun 14, 2004 (UTC)

202.156.2.51

(contribs) - Wiping Earth, Microsoft, Bill Gates. -- Grunt 02:18, 2004 Jun 14 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours. - 66.26.196.253 02:30, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

68.223.42.61

Repeated vandalism of the Al Smith article. RickK 03:27, Jun 13, 2004 (UTC)

24.118.195.36

User is violently disagreeing with a particular interpretation of The Wizard of Oz (1939 movie), and fouling up that article in the process.

212.23.3.153 and 212.23.3.151

Have repeatedly contributed nonsense to current events, deleting content and adding offensive things about some person. I tried to revert, but please check that I did it right.

202.191.103.173

Also contributing nonsense to David wang, and has vandalised Wikipedia:Speedy deletions and Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion, and both mine and User:Theseer's user pages. --Stormie 11:19, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

Theseer

Almost certainly also 202.191.103.173 contributions 211.26.118.205 contibutions possibly 203.43.164.19 conributions but I'm not so sure about that one. theresa knott 12:29, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

  • User:Theseer - repeatedly removed speedy delete tag from nonsense article David wang, which he appears to be using to abuse someone. How mature. —Stormie 11:04, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
    • In this edit [5] Theseer says "sorry. my brother managed to touch my computer", so I guess we should wait and see if any more vandalism occurs. —Stormie 11:14, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

68.7.15.227

  • 68.7.15.227 (talk · contribs) Has repeatedly edited first-aid related pages to add spam links. When the pages are reverted the user adds the links again.
    -- Tjwood 09:17, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:68.192.144.32

Stealthy insertion of false statistics into several articles. RickK 06:27, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

AdamG

  • AdamG (talk · contribs) Adding articles on trivia (races in Star Trek), fails to mark them as fictional, does not respond to comments on user: and user talk:.
    --Smack 01:15, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • I had added "In the fictional Star Trek universe," to over a dozen of his articles (working from top down) when I met Morwen (working from bottom up) putting the copyvio notice on all his articles. Doesn't that just beat all.  :-) SWAdair | Talk 07:15, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

80.3.160.4

Has edited Background history of the September 11, 2001 attacks twice with very NPOV content about dictators, assasins, anti-US claims about murdering children, etc. --VampWillow 00:39, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

If you mean POV, that makes sense, if you meant NPOV, then how is that bad? Ilyanep 18:11, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Those edits are still there. I personally don't see them as vandalism, but if they're inaccurate, someone should revert them. RickK 07:22, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

62.219.120.119

62.219.120.119 (talk · contribs) Seems to be fond of adding spurious external links. --Smack 21:14, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

194.8.54.248, 194.8.54.249, 194.8.54.250, 194.8.54.251

I should, perhaps, make it clear I do not have the intention of looking at the 2 IP addresses I haven't annotated - I probably gave the impression I was going through them systematically. Erm. I'm not. It's annoying. I mean, I noticed that other people had been reverting those I did look at, so I'm sure I'm being overly anxious. Which reminds me, I haven't had my tablets. --bodnotbod 00:48, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
(There seems little doubt these IPs are all one and the same person: see Michelle Branch: history for instance).
I'm not knowledgeable about these things - but having looked extensively at the edits made by the two IPs I've annotated I wondered if it was two students sitting next to each other in the same library: one of them a fairly nice chap and the other intent on being mischievous. Cos there's a definite difference in behaviour depending on the Ip you look at. --bodnotbod 17:20, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC)

Making extensive changes to YYYY in music, YYYY in sports, YYYY in film (where YYYY is a year). Changing lots of dates, for instance in 1984 in music and Michelle Branch, he insists on repeatedly changing her birth year from 1983 to 1984, although, for instance her official autobiography and many other sources say 1983.

Also insists on creating pages with lowercase last names, like Summer altice, which others then have to move to the uppercase version.

There are far too many changes for me to research, and this is not my area of interest anyway. I don't know if he is mixing legitimate changes with vandalism, or is just seriously misguided, or what.

This user was reported before, below, by User:Seth Ilys.

-- Curps 14:16, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'm not convinced it's vandalism. Looks like lot's of good faith edits in there. perhaps llisting on clueless newbies is more appropriate? theresa knott 16:07, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

128-bit era (multiple IPs)

MULTIPLE IPS -- For this listing it is easier not to list the IPs, but list the problem instead. There are multiple IPs using 128-bit era as a chat room. I keep trying to revert to a good copy of the article but keep getting edit conflicts. They are reposting over each other so fast I can't even revert. I'll check this article later to see if it is possible to revert. Just wanted to let others know so they can look into it also. Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 08:21, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Ah, It looks like Hadal has been able to get in two good reverts, but they keep posting. SWAdair | Talk 08:25, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I've blocked all but one IP involved (total of three IPs blocked). I would have protected, but the last time I did that without warning the users (in that case, there were five IPs doing it) I was chided in an edit summary. Heh. If it hasn't cooled down already (or if the users return), I'll protect the article. -- Hadal 08:29, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The page has been protected for now, as the vandalism just kept coming. *sigh* -- Hadal 08:57, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I unprotected it seeing as they're probably not going to continue. If they do, we'll just protect it again. Guanaco 15:51, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

200.42.95.188

Spamming with those amazon referer pages. Every page in its history. Going on right now.
-- Taak 02:34, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:Jiang

(Note the accented "i". This is not the same person as User:Jiang). Replaced article test, no other vandalism yet but has copied the real Jiang's user and user talk pages, just like the other pseudo-users that have been around recently.
-- DrBob 02:19, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:Svigor

User:Svigor | talk | contributions)

The user is threatening on Talk:White nationalism to go to a white nationalist board and suggest that members there come to Wikipedia to edit the White nationalism article to their preferred POV. Has not committed vandalism per se, although has added extensive pro-white nationalist external links to the article which I have run out of reverts to change for the next 24 hours or so. RickK 23:44, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)


User:219.88.158.143

Vandalised the featured article page by switching Image:Tea plant drawing.png to Image:Cannabis.jpeg. I switched it back but be on the lookout. blankfaze | •• 22:18, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:63.169.104.2

Has blanked my user page and Richard Genovese. (Furthermore, he edits, such as at User talk:24.168.92.117, to remove any rejoinder to what he says.) I reluctantly add to this page. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:48, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:216.110.63.180

Vandalized Fantasia Barrino, may be more to come. Already reverted changes. Gamaliel 18:44, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:212.23.3.153

Has vandalized Current Events several times. Also various requests for blocking -Nilmerg 12:14, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:24.156.42.230

Recently added a bunch of nonsense to Fabian Society. Had previously vandalized Attack on Pearl Harbor and Louis Riel. Scott Burley 05:45, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)


User:Ma:ximus Rex

I have blocked User:Ma:ximus Rex for 24 hours for vandalism. He has mirrored Maximus Rex's user page and created a Template:Racist to add to articles. I thought it was the real Max Rex until I looked at his contributions. It is clear from copying the real Max's user page that the intent is to create confusion while vandalising articles. - Tεxτurε 22:32, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)


169.204.230.146


Random vandalism about some guy named James. -- DropDeadGorgias (talk) 17:10, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)

67.78.3.122


Has been adding offtopic commercial external links to several articles, over the past few days. -- Popsracer 14:10, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)


User:66.123.252.135


adding false information to articles, starting articles with false information. -- Conti 11:13, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:Dyzml

User:RickK

  • Pretending to be User:RickK (identical name except for umlaut over i, identical user page), this person has attempted to stir up a fight with User:Nunh-huh, then created a nonsense redirect (Barbara Simpson) which was speedily deleted, then vandalised United States. —Stormie 03:34, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)
    • He's blocked x 24 hrs. - Nunh-huh 03:41, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
      • This is a returning vandal - the same methodology was used several days ago. User was permanantly banned then - should be permanantly banned here as well. Snowspinner 05:41, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)
        • Perma-blocked. →Raul654 05:47, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)

User:Himself.

Vandalised several pages, including Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism and Wikipedia:help. Tom- 10:21, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

203.51.137.167


-- Burgundavia 05:35, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC) - mainly on Greek mythology

User:12.203.213.190

Vandalism of several pages. RickK 01:53, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)

User:4.228.213.*, User:4.228.90.*, User:4.227.175.*

This user has been repeatedly adding an off-topic paragraph to Anti-American sentiment, and before that was making other contested edits as well. I would ordinarily consider this to be a dispute over content, but he's taken to "disguising" his edits with misleading edit summaries or by immediately making "legitimate" edits afterward to make reversion more difficult. Also changes IPs after every edit and won't respond on the article's talk page. Seems to have an anti-Canadian and anti-immigration agenda. Bryan 01:13, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User creating actor substubs

known as:

and probably others refuses to answer several messages to his page, keeps creating pages regardless. Modus operandi the same. He's also using an anon IP roaming address. Not deliberate vandalism, just a pain. Dunc_Harris|☺ 21:52, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC). Move to speedy delete articles?

Could it be a bot? The substubs all seem to be the same. These aren't normally candidates for speedy deletion, but if he refuses to be talk to, that may be what we should do. Guanaco 21:58, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The edits seem to be too slow to be a bot. Guanaco 21:59, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I think this user may have acquired a username as user:TheCustomOfLife user talk:TheCustomOfLife, special:contributions/TheCustomOfLife. thank whatsit for that. Creating a lot of new pages. Trying to talk to him/her... Dunc_Harris|☺ 22:20, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:TheCustomOfLife denies that he/she was the substub author, sorry for the misidentification. Dunc_Harris|☺ 22:36, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I am fairly sure the only IP User:TheCustomOfLife editted from is 65.0.129.226. I have found him very responsive, and he picked up on wiki markup fairly quickly, then Wikipedia intro style, and even took the responsibility to circle back around and clean up his early entries. He has greatly expanded/improved Wikipedia coverage of US soap operas, and has turned Another World from a minimalist stub I made from the original contribution ("The emmy-winning NBC soap Another World air from 1964 to 1999 for 35 years.") into one of the most comprehensive TV series articles on Wikipedia. Not bad for someone who's only been here one week. Niteowlneils 00:04, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
User:TheCustomOfLife has been incredibly helpful in cleaning up the mess left by the anon with the ever-changing proxies. He/she refuses to answer polite posts. I've even tried an insult, but no go. Also, he/she never returns to flesh the articles out. I got reamed for putting these up for speedy deletion and I am sick and tired of either cleaning them up myself or posting them for cleanup. These should be deleted on sight as vandalism assuming that the proxies can't be blocked. They're a waste of time, and I feel we all have more to contribute to this site than cleaning up the electronic equivalent of toilet-papering a house. - Lucky 6.9 00:06, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
    • Comment: I'd bet the proverbial dollars to donuts that "The emmy-winning NBC soap Another World air from 1964 to 1999 for 35 years" came from the same chowderhead. - Lucky 6.9 00:16, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:12.155.100.99


-- vandalizing Nick Berg article. Conti 12:20, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)

User:211.28.81.109


-- Repeatedly vandalizing Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom over several days. RickK 06:26, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)


User:Magicpop

User:203.195.216.114

User:81.2.113.149

  • Contribs - Vandalizing Bush article - He may be a "wanker" or not but we don't need graffiti. - Tεxτurε 18:26, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)


User:209.162.224.62 User:209.162.235.146


-- 80.177.236.68 12:37, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC) (added by mwsealey)

Is inserting libellous statements to Pegasos entry about company and management, due to petty grudge. Not NPOV.

User:61.241.92.2

3+ cases of vandalism:

  1. Weather lore
  2. Acetaminophen
  3. Wiki

(see Special:contributions/61.241.92.2)

—siroχo 09:00, Jul 10, 2004 (UTC)

User:66.2.146.6

  • Vandalized my home page. No previous edit history, but the language is consistent with the numbnuts who fought us over the "Jeffrey T. Nomura" fiasco. - Lucky 6.9 20:24, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
This user linked Lucky 6.9's user page with a very disgusting picture and said that it is Lucky 6.9's favorite food. It is totally not appropriate and the user should be blocked. --Lst27 23:48, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
"I'm a radio producer/on-air personality and frustrated musician and actor living in the Palm Springs, California area who performs blow jobs on AIDS infected homeless men.", disgusting as it is. The user has one edit and was probably on an anon proxy, contact me if he does it again but for now it's pretty pointless to block him as he is probably never comming back. --AEvar Arnfjo:rd- Bjarmason 23:58, 2004 Jul 12 (UTC)
More attacks on Lucky, myself and Ezhiki. All using 66.2.146 prefix. Noisy 19:15, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Copied from VP 

66.2.146.0/24 blocked for 48hrs

It said to announce it here on Range blocks, i've blocked that range because of extreme unpoliteness to say the least to two user pages, Lucky 6.9 and Noisy, you can read the history yourself but it's not pretty. -- AEvar Arnfjo:rd- Bjarmason 20:17, 2004 Jul 15 (UTC)

  • Ooh, that's a memory that will linger. Glad I've drastically changed my eating habits. Wonder what the sick little bastard would think of a large Italian ex-trucker getting upside his head? Thanks much for helping, AEvar. Owe ya one. - Lucky 6.9 22:50, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • See our article on shock sites for many more links to ( er how shall I put this) 'interesting images' theresa knott 23:03, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:172.142.164.60

Posted what seemed to be a Spanish(?) job advertisment on Bitch magazine and Ladies' Home Journal. Ed g2s 19:23, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:168.9.250.3

Intent on reverting POV back into articles on US political figures (examples: Jean Carnahan, Phil Gingrey) and the National Rifle Association. - jredmond 17:34, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

    • This user's posts seem perfectly fine to me. I think your reversions are POV. These changes are not vandalism, they are differences of opinion. RickK 20:44, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
      • Differences of opinion are fine, but attempting to protect one's preferred version of a particular article through reversion is not (especially when done at the expense of otherwise-helpful cleanup). Additionally, [6], [7], and [8] stand out as rather POV edits. Earlier entries in that address's list of contributions include nonsense edits like [9] and [10]. - jredmond 21:18, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:80.4.224.4

5 cases of vandalism:

  1. 2×User talk:Siroxo (yah, that ones starting to bother me...)
  2. 2×Wikipedia:Orphaned Articles/M-Z
  3. Wikipedia:Glossary

—siroχo 15:32, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

Also URL spamming over on Meta (MediaWiki 1.3 comments and bug reports (history)) which managed to completely screw up my bug report and strangely evade an Edit Conflict. --Phil | Talk 15:56, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

User:216.99.210.41

Seems to be on a crusade against Johnny Depp, keeps adding insulting comments to Willy Wonka. Ferkelparade 08:15, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I've warned him/her, and I'll keep an eye on 'em until I must depart. -- Hadal 08:20, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:68.94.165.223

Has blanked United Empire Loyalists and added nonsense edits to Anal Cunt. Neutrality 02:13, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

  • The edit to Anal Cunt is a reversion of another user's POV. It looks good to me. RickK 21:09, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)

User:12.216.168.133

Is posting substubs even as I type that are little more than minor specifications about present and future sports venues. Some are copyvios. Has been warned twice by RickK and Texture. - Lucky 6.9 22:48, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)


Ip address 80.44.187.62 with the name John

persistent vandalism of Elan Vital Andries 21:11, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • This user has been blocked for 24 hours. RickK 21:15, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)

User:I support the Cabal

Attacking User:Plato's userpage. Imitating RickK. Snowspinner 19:57, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)

  • Blocked for multiple policy violations. -- The Anome 21:32, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User: Voute Royale

Has made only four contributions, these mostly of a abusive nature. Examples are on the talk pages of Jimbo Wales and Eloquence (or rather, their histories, as Voute's comments have now been deleted). A self-declared member of the 'Red Faction'. Arno 03:19, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User talk:66.185.84.208

Another user with a long history of vandalism. Latest article is Final Fantasy: Unlimited, a useless, bizarre substub. Has been warned several times, but keeps coming back. Please block user. - Lucky 6.9 02:22, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)


User:John Smith

Daniel Radcliffe etc. Probably same person as User:219.77.68.238

User:212.138.47.17

Long history of bizarre, rambling tinfoil hattery on both Filipino and Palestinian issues. Latest this evening was a copyvio pasted to Silver-tongued claiming that the AIDS virus was engineered in America. - Lucky 6.9 05:36, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:219.77.68.238

Vandalizing the entire page. George W. Bush --Buster 05:29, Jul 10, 2004 (UTC)

140.139.35.250 or 140.139.57.92

Oh, this is weird: HQ US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMMAND 140.139.0.0 - 140.139.255.255 UNITED STATES 140.139.57.92 (talk · contribs)
--Gzuckier 17:48, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User talk:64.12.117.7

Used a bogus article called "Tamil-Malayan languages" to express his love for someone. Has been warned of vandalism and unacceptable behavior before. See his talk page. - Lucky 6.9 16:13, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)

24.19.14.88

The author of the recently deleted Jeffrey T. Nomura page is back, claiming the article was deleted by a bunch of "punk bitches" and is campaigning to get it reinstated. Article was a vanity page about one of his/her teachers. - Lucky 6.9 01:35, 8 Jul 2004 (UTC)


162.40.160.251

Hitting Osama bin Laden repeatedly. -- Grunt (talk) 21:56, 2004 Jul 7 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment

An anon user has been deleting entries from this page and adding editorial comments to other entries with at least two different IPs: 149.174.164.84's contributions, 172.132.53.15's contributions -- BCorr|Брайен 21:40, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Articles linked from Slashdot story

Please note that Slashdot has published a story on Wikipedia today, linking directly to Crushing by elephant and GNU/Linux_naming_controversy. The articles are being vandalised, presumably by Slashdotters - please keep an eye on them. -- ChrisO 09:58, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:68.36.175.254

User is making death threats against me as well as engaging in simple vandalism. See Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/User:68.36.175.254

User is also using the 205.188.116.* AOL proxy address block, seen in Neutrality's report below. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:34, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:204.203.21.238

Sustained vandalism to page Maharaji with obscenity and deletion.--jossi 00:15, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:205.188.116.205

Has vandalized my userpage. Neutrality 23:52, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC) "Contribs"

User:DPFJr / 209.247.222....

(I forgot to sign this. It was me: WMC) Not quite sure if this is the right place... DPFJr appears to be somewhat obsessive (creating Relative motion theory, a close copy A Theory of Everything, another Wave Structure of Matter Theory and probably more). I listed some on Vfd; he persisently removed the Vfd header. The he blanked my user page [11] once under his own name and repeatedly as 209.247.222.31, or ...28. I have tried to remonstrate on his talk page with no success.

(William M. Connolley 10:36, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)) Vandalism continues. Can I please ask for a temp-ban at least of the anon IP's he is using?

(William M. Connolley 12:00, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)) Continues. Also as 209.247.222.32 and 209.247.222.36.

This continued vandalism clearly oversteps the mark. I have put a 24-hour block on 209.247.222.0/24, which should put a stop to this for now. -- The Anome 12:36, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
(William M. Connolley 15:41, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)) He is now back again as 209.247.222.43, removing Vfd notices. Can you block again please?

4.46.1.85

This IP address is always going back and changing information about Soka Gakkai International and related pages to remove references to Soka being considered controversial or a 'cult' by some. I feel like the article text does a good job of representing both sides of the argument (ie. being NPOV), but s/he seems to just be interest in whitewashing the whole situation. This has happened repeatedly over a long stretch of time, all from the same IP. Does the community agree that this is worthy of a ban by wikipedia standards? --Carl 08:55, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)

He or she did it again. The summary said, "Don't know what NPOV means. Corrected facts and removed editorializing," but in actuality, all they removed was the statement that some people believe that Soka Gakkai is a cult. Well, go to http://www.buddhajones.com/ and you'll see that it's true. Some people think it's a cult. Does everyone? No. Does wikipedia say it's a cult? No. Someone should really ban this user, since they only spout propaganda for Soka Gakkai, instead of helping with anything else.

User:217.43.231.31

Nothing interesting here. Your garden variety vandal. Already reverted, just waiting for the block. Snowspinner 03:57, Jul 6, 2004 (UTC)

Don't block unless this user continues to vandalize. When Snowspinner made that comment, the anon had not been warned. Keep an eye on him. Guanaco 04:05, 6 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Eek. My bad, sorry. Was excessively multitasking when I posted this one - shouldn't have asked for the block, and should have warned myself. :( Snowspinner 17:50, Jul 6, 2004 (UTC)

152.163.253.104

Vandalized Wikipedia:Requests for comment by replacing complaints against particular editors by his own statements at a WITCHHUNT. I reverted. jallan 18:38, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

209.6.24.143

Has vandalized Boston, Massachusetts, Nick Berg and Africa by removing current, replacing current links with bogus ones and adding Joke links such as Black people love us-website on Africa. Stopped for now, but i wont be here all day to watch him so this is a little heads up. --AEvar Arnfjo:rd- Bjarmason 17:51, 2004 Jul 5 (UTC)

contributions

209.205.186.253

Has vandalized:

Contributions

68.5.14.231

Responsible for vulgar, perverted substubs. This may also be the idiot responsible for those substubs in which the name and content match. One of those is his. Block this moron. - Lucky 6.9 08:47, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • Check out this f**ktard's "contributions:" [12] - Lucky 6.9 09:02, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:69.138.174.169

Adding hate speech to pages e.g. Faggot, changing instances of 'gay' to 'homosexual' e.g. Fred Phelps, other general malfeasance: The Cask of Amontillado

xasa.com and wikimoz.org directory links

63.227.76.25, 80.58.4.111, 81.172.108.8, 81.172.108.141, 195.226.230.37, (User:Gtru e | talk | contributions), (User:Raimunr | talk | contributions), (User:Ruhter | talk | contributions), (User:Torino | talk | contributions), (User:Torinor | talk | contributions), (User:Tornito | talk | contributions), (User:Tronia | talk | contributions), (User:Willy r | talk | contributions)

Inserting directory links into various articles. --Zigger 21:15, 2004 Jul 4 (UTC)

67.82.139.160

Vandalising Toronto International Teen Movie Festival repeatedly despite warnings. -- Grunt (talk) 18:59, 2004 Jul 2 (UTC)

User:TrollmootsOfEnts

Vandalism of this page. --Lst27 18:54, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:207.218.152.146

rabbit - contribs.

Very childish behaviour. Put by User:Meelar on final warning, but has persisted. Dunc_Harris|☺ 11:22, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:Lir

Repeatedly vandalizing Saddam Hussein by reverting all edits performed by every user between his last insertion of a non-consensus header and the current edit. RickK 06:09, Jul 2, 2004 (UTC)

For example [13] and [14] and twice more on the same day after those two edits. theresa knott 07:28, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:66.32.248.241

Persistent vandalism and obscenities

User:664.252.123.223

Persistent vandalism and obscenities

24.198.42.70

Vandalising a number of articles by writing "[[Emily]] is a wicked cool kid." on them. - Eisnel 22:51, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

213.18.248.16

Vandalising a large list of articles; see his contribs. -- Grunt (talk) 14:07, 2004 Jul 1 (UTC)

User:203.97.2.243

Persistently adding spam links to www.mefootball.com and similar forum websites. Now adding misleading edit summaries. - gadfium 05:12, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

User:208.147.1.2

Persistent vandalism to Nick Berg and VfD pages. - Lucky 6.9 04:36, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)


=== User:217.128.42.12 Maranatha Bible College === might be abuse might be ignorance, I can't tell don't know the user's history Williamb 13:12, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)I have not vandalised or in any way altered Wikipedia pages, I am using a school computer so is it possible that another user on this IP address has offended exiting material?

Yes. Though this sort of question is better asked on the Wikipedia:Help desk. -- Beland 02:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC} I would have thought teen or younger would be the culprits, but once politics and religion were considered i realized what true and immature sickos we,re dealing with.. Those who run and lead this world we attempt to live on..

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipedia_vandalism"

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_investigation/Archives/2004/07&oldid=1137450239"