Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frost War

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frost War[edit]

Utterly unnotable. Would be orphaned except for a lone "see also" link at the bottom of the flaming article. [[User:Neutrality|—Neutrality/talk]] 02:48, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete [[User:Neutrality|—Neutrality/talk]] 02:48, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, this is the single most unuseful article on Wikipedia. Signed, Ashibaka tlk 03:00, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. That's a big claim but a case can be made. User:Neutrality seems to have deleted it already, which means we've now also lost the talk page where the VfD debate from the previous unsuccessful listing had been archived. But I'm not recommending undeletion. Andrewa 10:20, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • This survived VfD before, but as I recall the author of the article was actively participating in the discussion, promising to continue work on the article and related topics, and I think that swayed a lot of us. I vote delete this time around, but I definitely don't think it should've been speedied. Everyking 13:59, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Geez, Everyking, you've been voting delete all over. If I didn't know better I'd think you'd joined us filthy amoral deletionists. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:28, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Comment-- Neutrality, I didn't like this article at all, but why'd you delete it before the VfD process was over? Ashibaka tlk 15:29, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Undelete it so that non-admins can view it and see just why it deserves to be deleted. -Sean Curtin 00:32, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
  • Yet again the process has been abused by admins! Please do not speedy delete articles that are being discussed.Dr Zen 02:39, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Since it has been challenged, it's no longer a speedy candidate. Temporarily undeleted in order to allow the VfD to complete. The prior vote is here. Delete. Rossami (talk) 03:43, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It has not become any more or less valuable since it passed VfD last time. As an aside, this is an article I read with some enjoyment myself a while back, before I had made any edits. It's an interesting case study.Dr Zen 03:59, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Worthless. Postdlf 06:26, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. GOOPTI. -- Antaeus Feldspar 06:36, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Completely unimportant, uninteresting, worthless drivel. rturus 16:34, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Utterly worthless. Away with this crap. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:29, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a chronicle of everything that has ever happened on the Internet. --Carnildo 00:33, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. silsor 07:01, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - same reasons as last time, except more so. -- Cyrius|✎ 07:06, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Calling this "masturbatory" would be too kind. —No-One Jones 07:17, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This should have remained a speedy delete so we wouldn't have to waste our time with this crap. Gamaliel 07:38, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. How the hell did this craptacular thing avoid deletion in April? --Edeans 04:02, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • What they said. -Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 06:19, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Burn it. Burn it now. My eyes they hurt from reading it. 131.91.238.38 06:29, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Flamewars (or Frostwars) aren't encyclopedia material. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 11:49, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Fancruft. Painful. --Improv 18:40, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is as notable as the arguement next door. Uninteresting, no encyclopedic value, not notable. --Andylkl 11:19, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. →Raul654 13:41, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable flamewar in not-particularly notable forum. We don't even have mainspace articles about notable flamewars in Wikipedia. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:47, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Frost_War&oldid=357519240"