Talk:Ashanti (singer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 15 September 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. A primary topic needn't meet both criteria, but either criterion is a valid argument here. (WP:GLOBAL is an article-content essay, not guideline or policy, and wouldn't factor in to arranging the pages.) -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


– There is no other mononymous use of Ashanti that is prominent enough to warrant changing this article's title; it would be throwing a fork in the way of readers for no reason Happypillsjr 22:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the page Ashanti is a dab page with content. It is ineligible as a page move target unless it is also renamed. This request has been modified to reflect that fact. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • What are the page views for this and other Ashantis? O.N.R. (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Per PRIMARYTOPIC. This topic dominates page viewsВ²C 06:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is nonsensical, the Ashanti (or Asante) are an ethnic group in Ghana. Would violate WP:GLOBAL --Varavour (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The singer may be the only unambiguous use of "Ashanti" as a single word, but Ashanti Empire and its various associated articles are arguably more significant, and certainly more encyclopedic, meanings of the term. Tevildo (talk) 09:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The Ashanti ethnic and cultural group and their empire are the clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per what WP:PRIMARYTOPIC actually says. @Happypillsjr: were you not aware of the meaning of Ashanti? Would you like to consider withdrawing this proposal now? In ictu oculi (talk) 13:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by long-term significance.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose This seems like one of those Apple vs Apple Inc. cases where even overwhelmingly clear interest in page views is overridden by consideration of long term significance.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
🍏 But the fruit is considered primary by long term significance at Apple. In this case the supposed historical significance is insufficient to warrant a primary topic for that topic, but the page views favoring primary topic for the singer are overwhelming. So I don’t think the Apple comparison supports even a weak Oppose here. To the contrary. —В²C 00:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:NOPRIMARY. The Ashanti language and Ashanti people, and many other topics such as Ashanti Region, are likely to have far more long-term significance than this singer. The criterion for page views is not some kind of tie-breaker for long-term significance: both criteria must be met to establish a primary topic. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • A requirement to meet both criteria is a misconception apparently held by all Supporters here. “In most cases, the topic that is primary with respect to usage is also primary with respect to long-term significance; in many other cases, only one sense of primacy is relevant.”. I hope the closer evaluates the !votes accordingly. —В²C 13:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Infobox image[edit]

Hi, I just noticed that the infobox picture for this article is missing. Can anyone find another one to replace it? Thanks. 2001:569:55E1:8900:44CC:63E1:708F:1656 (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How fun was it to be on honey girls[edit]

You were great on it 2601:47:4780:36B0:5169:E5A2:9AE8:DBAE (talk) 14:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for a response from Albuquerque NM. Concert already paid for was cancelled due to weather. Don't leave us hanging[edit]

Concert cancelled in Albuquerque NM on June 17th 2022... 67.131.78.33 (talk) 02:55, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]