Wikipedia talk:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDepartment of Fun Project‑class Bottom‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
BottomThis page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

* This article doesn't[edit]

meet any editorial standards, and is not funny. No way would this make "best of craigslist." Delete it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by A3burke (talk • contribs) 03:18, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

  • If this article is going to be here, can someone at least fix that template? Bduddy 00:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... and THIS ARTICLE! (Sorry, that one was too obvious and could not be left unsaid. Barno 01:43, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
But I already added it a couple of days ago :P CryptoDerk 01:52, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
It's not bad. AND if we delete it, someone else is going to make it. But this time WORSE. Mocha2007 (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That is untrue ItchyBurrito (talk) 01:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be moved to Meta:.[edit]

Don't create POV "essays" or commentary on a Wikipedia project page. -- Netoholic @ 22:46, 2005 Feb 23 (UTC)

Concur with Netoholic. nsh 17:48, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Unconcur with assholes.

__

This page soooo[edit]

violates WP:BEANS. bd2412 T 21:39, 16 December 2005

I agree. Instead of writing about things not to write about, I think our time is much more well spent improving actual articles. — Kortaggio Proclamations Declarations 01:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now that doesn't even make sense.[edit]

What's it doing on Wikipedia? --Nerd42 (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the joke is to do with where You links to... --Sonic Mew 19:00, 15 October 2006 (UT


High School[edit]

If creating an article about your old high school is such a bad idea then why is there a category for High Schools? —The preceding comment was added by Kenallen (talk • contribs) .

It's a joke (like the whole page). It links to Randolph School, which is the school of the founder of Wikipedia, who said people who make articles about their own high schools, should be free to do so, and such articles should be tolerated. When he said that, he named Randolph School as an arbitrary example. --Rob 23:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. The article definitely made me lol, but the high school part interupts the flow.Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 06:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Anything written under the influence of recreational substances"?? I've done some of my best writing under the influence of recreational substances! --Nscheffey(T/C) 01:27, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sense of Humour[edit]

ok people, just because you think something isn't funny doesn't mean you delete it off the article! THe article is poitless and just for fun so there is no need to delete something that has done no harm!!!!! H-BOMB 22:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Wales[edit]

The first 'you' in "You or the organization you work for." is linked to Jimbo Wales. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CRouleau (talk • contribs) 06:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

What the H***![edit]

Am I the only one who's noticed that most of these articles have already been created?

The Title is too long![edit]

Should we move the article to something shorter?GreaterWikiholic 04:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's this long to make the humorous intent explicit. If you need a shorter version to link to, WP:STUPID or WP:DUMB exist for a reason. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 05:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for explaining that! I was really, really, really, really, really wondering about it. – AndyFielding (talk) 19:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Cats[edit]

The cats are so adorable!!! :D Also, I love the captions. Lottie 11:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Can I direct you to the Kitten War site [www.kittenwar.com]?

No. 27 should include "transport in London" (whether or not in conjunction with the 2012 Olympics). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.86.0.10 (talk) 13:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My cat is cuter. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 01:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have a super cute manx kitten... with large ears and no tail. Or mabye she's a bunny. No, she meows... Mocha2007 (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Friends of Gays[edit]

Are there things that can be added to this list? Like this for instance? -- Roleplayer 16:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny[edit]

It's funny how even nerds want to feel superior to somebody. You guys like to think, hey - we're dateless wonders who have no life, but we're way better than those Star Trek or World of Warcraft losers! What a waste of time that Warcraft stuff is! When Wikipedia eventually dies and is forgotten, you'll wish you hadn't wasted your time. 70.54.127.74 12:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know what else is funny? Losers who take there rime to write a paragraph of insults on a website that he/she cares nothing about. Jeez, you'd think they would have something better to do with there time. 76.84.12.144 23:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like correcting the typos & misspellings in their posts? (Yes, I checked the spelling of every word in that sentence: I didn't have anything better to do at the moment.) -- llywrch 21:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, what were you guys saying? I was busy getting a life. – AndyFielding (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date[edit]

"The high school you attend". I guess we're going to have to remove this one, now that it's become the norm to allow articles about high schools. I guess also "Individual [Insert current bubblegum idol here] songs" since most of them have articles too. Oh, world. 199.71.183.2 18:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I added the mudkip lieking thing. 204.52.215.13 23:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at (current) items no. 24 through 28 (at the very least) to get the idea... red (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quote?[edit]

On No 2., someone put 'keep dreaming , brota.' Should this be regarded as vandalism or not?Iceberg2229 (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes This should be regarded as vandalism (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should be regarded as humorous --Hasney (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

Wikipedia:1000 things not to write your article about needs to be merged here, before it grows any larger. Or possibly made into a subpage of this one. (eg move to Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create/1000 things not to write your article about). Or one/both of them deleted as violating WP:BEANS (as suggested above). -- Quiddity (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply] 


 number 10 : "pop culture": at least 14756 articles may be relevant of such a category...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.206.162.141 (talk) 08:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GAME[edit]

Could we ban wikiloyering in here like WP:SPIDER a sort of "What is fameis (101 or 102 fans...) is right out!"--99.145.121.213 (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SUCK[edit]

Can we be original enough to copy pages off Uncyclopedia fro humor?

--67.242.208.137 (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well where do I put the cats?[edit]

Where can we put cat gifs, funny cat pictures, and plain cute cats? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.5.166.66 (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook, or Instagram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolando 1208 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or here, of course. – AndyFielding (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is intended to promote somones cats.[edit]

"Creating or editing an article just to show off a picture of a cute cat is always a terrible idea. Besides, there's always someone somewhere who thinks their cat is cuter."
This is the prime quotation of this ARTICLE. There is a total of 3 cats in this article. It appears that this article was created just for showing these cats! The user who is owned by these cats may haven't been able to resist him to put his cats somewhere that he found this article safe to put them for ever!Vanischenu mTalk 22:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC),10:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cat lore Yesseyyesseyyessey (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have some of whatever you guys are having. – AndyFielding (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not fit the nonbiased format of Wikipedia.[edit]

While some of the claims on this page may be true, this page itself does not follow the format set forth by just about every other article on Wikipedia and should be deleted for this reason. Instead it should be supplanted by a non-satirical How To on creating Wikipedia pages, and the guidelines for thus. In other words, keep this site professional, and keep Uncyclopedia articles on Uncyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.221.140.211 (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an article: it's a project page and intended as Wikipedia humour. Double sharp (talk) 00:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The first cat on the page[edit]

It looks just like mine! ok... Waylon1 (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Too long title[edit]

This is a funny title, but it is too long. Should we either move this page to a shorter title or shrink the title using {{DISPLAYTITLE}}? UpsandDowns1234 (Talk to me) (My Contribs) 06:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. As the disclaimer at the top says "This page is intended as humour", so a silly title fits it perfectly. Yintan  07:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No articles for individual songs?[edit]

I know this is a humor page, but why is this there? There are probably thousands of articles about individual songs. Is this something Wikipedia is no longer considering notable for the most part? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yojunemeow (talk • contribs) 17:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In its earliest version, this page singled out one artist not to make song articles for. Some time after that, the page was changed to not making an article for a bubblegum pop song. Around 2010, as part of a large edit whose summary included "putting back the humour", it was made about individual songs generally. Yes, it makes no sense. We have lots of articles about individual songs, and it would not improve the encyclopedia to get rid of all of them. Vadder (talk) 20:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

“esoteric programming language” should link to Esoteric programming language

“noteworthy exception” should link to Atheism

191.254.112.81 (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Half done linked Atheism to 'this rule' since it makes more contextual sense. Added 59: "to 'test the boundaries of computer programming language design'." This preserves the original Java joke, while adding a sentence from the Esoteric programming language article that sounds humorous when said sarcastically or without context. Hecseur (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a humorous article, and I get it that humor is sometimes irreverent, but I just don't think a sweeping dismissal of the sincere faith of billions is particularly funny. Rnickel (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

nice[edit]

thanks to me, there are now 69 of these useless rules and weird stuff. Billy rocky fernansa (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2020(Free VBucks at the bottom)[edit]

Added more humour Editor52342 (talk) 02:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Editor52342:  Not done: - no request. GoingBatty (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entry on List of lists of lists of lists is false.[edit]

Lists that may appear there:

The article of the russian Minecraft youtubers SUCH POO[edit]

Rikolit,Compot,Pixel,Villager-friend,Rikolit Subscriber Falirit (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse order of notices & removal of "Bug off"[edit]

I think it might be a good idea to put the purple humor warning sign first on the page, because I've seen it most commonly appear as the first thing on a humorous article.

Also, the tone of the other notice was a bit unclear to me. At first, it tries to be helpful and neutral, and suggests a redirect to an actually useful article, but then it tells me to "bug off"? I thought I could trust that notice, I thought it was useful for me, but it kind of hurt my feelings at the end (and could be confusing for other people). I suggest removing the last sentence: "Now please, bug off, we've got more important things to be on about". Ciderpoem (talk) 19:36, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

Hello sirs, I have a request to add "showing a list of unofficial Kirby media. Waylon1 (talk) 04:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Minkai(rawr!)(see where I screwed up) 19:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2021[edit]

In the section "See Also", I suggest linking WP:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, and back from there to here too. 46.114.104.192 (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: that isn't really in-line with the style of humor on this page. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 15:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A very important request...[edit]

This article is lacking in many things and must be expanded on by doing the following: - Adding more cat pictures - Adding more cat pictures - And finally, Adding more cat pictures

(this is a joke section, to a joke article, but yes I want to see more cats)

RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Praise for this article[edit]

Whoever decided to make this deserves to be a administrator

Hope he is already one Rektz (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timwi is in fact a sysop. -GoatLordServant ☂ (Talk - Contribs) 14:18, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bedrock is better than Java[edit]

42069: A list of a thousand reasons that Bedrock Minecraft is better than Java Minecraft. Trust me, nobody will agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makafushigi (talk • contribs) 18:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2021[edit]

94. A self-reference. We already have enough self-reference articles!

172.112.210.32 (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC) 172.112.210.32 (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw WP:Navel-gazing linked recently, but as those examples exist the entry seems pointy on this list. ~ cygnis insignis 03:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. There could be more in the future that you know, actually should exist. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 09:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2022[edit]

point 98 >> change "Did we already do that already?" to "Did we do that already?" 87.241.188.150 (talk) 12:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. I think that's the joke. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is FUNNY[edit]

Whoever made this is awesome M@R10FYREFLOWER 20:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4 cat pictures is not "endless"[edit]

There were times when I had to scroll up or down because there wasn't a cat picture on the side of the text on my phone screen. That clearly isn't endless.

2600:6C4E:1200:1E85:6C18:F1D7:8800:5D5A (talk) 04:49, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There also aren't any pictures of cats being petted.

2600:6C4E:1200:1E85:6C18:F1D7:8800:5D5A (talk) 04:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

4 cat pictures is too many 

Yesseyyesseyyessey (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Four cat pictures seems to be just the right number to lure people into posting comments about how many cat pictures there are, which I believe was the goal all along.– AndyFielding (talk) 19:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

God bless the most incredible article in this website[edit]

I love how because of this page there's the words "Keep dreamin', brotha." in an actual wikipedia article. Amazing. NotGuyFieri (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2023[edit]

On line 65, on the list. Give the word "girl" the hyperlink for the article "Myth" or the the article "Unobtanium". MEgstad (talk) 03:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Maybe you should try not wasting our time with stupid jokes. Meters (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Funny, seeing this reply on a humour list to begin with. Gotitbro (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request: Add an example of an allowed implosion[edit]

In the item 19, there are two examples given of allowable implosion articles. I propose adding a link to the Titan submersible implosion as well. 151.199.251.135 (talk) 16:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

113:[edit]

Some dumb show you and your brother made up when you were 12. 2603:8000:DB03:9B05:41FD:5C87:B653:8FE (talk) 05:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request: Modify #88 to include WP:CRYSTALBALL[edit]

Since #88 contains mention of future events, I think it would be appropriate to link WP:CRYSTALBALL there.

From "Your conspiracy theory that emus and squids will take over the world. Worship your new squimu overlords." to "Your conspiracy theory that emus and squids will take over the world in the future. Worship your new squimu overlords." MeowcaTheoRange (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2024[edit]

114. list of people who had attempted to make this article professional. Look, we spent a lot of time making this article so please don't immortalize the people who didn't like it 115. list of real extraterrestrial societies. I guess its not stupid but it would be really concerning if you knew that. So best you keep that to yourself 116. list of the day, month, and year all these points were made on. The only exception is 115, which will probably be outdated within the next century Splazor (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok im sorry this doesn't fit x to y, please ignore this Splazor (talk) 18:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 19:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:List_of_really,_really,_really_stupid_article_ideas_that_you_really,_really,_really_should_not_create&oldid=1215205603"