Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diudish language

Diudish language was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Diudish language

Orphaned article about a constructed language nobody except its author is using. Google gave me ~3 hits that are not Wikipedia or Wiktionary mirrors. Nothing indicates this is nothing more than a hobbyist project of one person. If the result here is DELETE, can this be deleted from Wiktionary also without separate voting? jni 14:44, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Update: I listed it for deletion in Wiktionary also. jni 07:06, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: nonnotable vanity project. I think Wiktionary will have to be handled separately. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:16, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete van-lang. -- Cyrius|✎ 18:35, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Only 3 Google hits says delete all over it. --Idont Havaname 18:40, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Private langauge. Geogre 19:17, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: needs to achieve some wider significance. Antandrus 19:21, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable conlang, probably vanity. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:14, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, its prominence will grow. -- Crevaner 10:21, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.