Talk:Adscam blog disclosure

I have reverted the censhorship of this article by someone who cited the Canadian publication ban. As Wikipedia is not subject to the ban, such censorship is not necessary.Mwalcoff 21:31, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

And I took out those blanket generalizations about "US people". I'm sure they were not universally true. If they are the opinions of a majority of Americans or of American jurists (a more likely story) the article should cite evidence of that. I did try to keep the argument for publishing, although the issue of Americans' feelings being hurt because someone might think their trials were unfair seems irrelevant to me. A lot of trials are unfair, ban or no ban. John FitzGerald 19:11, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

VfD

On April 8, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was merge with Sponsorship scandal. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Adscam blog disclosure for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:45, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)