User talk:Kay Dekker

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 14:57, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

In C[edit]

Greetings! If you'd like I'll copy the differences out for you -- do you have an email address set so the "email this user" link works for you? Computer realization sounds like a fun project; I'd like to hear how you made it. I'm still just getting my feet wet with synthesis myself. Still want to see if I can get together enough people at college to hold an "In C" party. Oh, and welcome again to the 'pedia! Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 05:36, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hello! That would be so kind of you. Yes, I believe my mail address is set properly: should it turn out that it isn't, I'm reachable at kaydekker@yahoo.co.uk if you wish to mail me. I have a set of implementation notes that I made as I worked on the piece, to which you're entirely welcome if you'd like them. Very briefly, I used Koan Pro to set up the patterns and to make the choices of the number of iterations of each pattern for each voice, and to control some of the other MIDI parameters such as velocity; running that gave me a MIDI output file - one particular random instance of the piece. Because Koan Pro isn't perfect about timing and so on, and because it can't do synchronisation like the rendezvous at pattern 53, I read the MIDI file into Harmony Assistant to quantise and do other postprocessing, and then to make an MP3 output file. It's 40+Mb, but you're welcome to have a copy (I don't think that would breach copyright awfully, would it? I hope not, because I'd like people to be able to hear it.) An In C party would be fun! What I'd like to do is a similar party for Spem in Alium, a 40-part motet by Thomas Tallis - do you know it? And thank you for your welcome!

Sent; let me know if you don't get it. And no, I don't know it, alas! Should get my hands on a score. Closest we got is my counterpoint class singing 8-parters in the stairwells, which was usually the highlight of my day. If you did have a Tallis party, I'd be awfully tempted to show up at your doorstep, which considering your email address is probably a bit far from Florida for a weekend jaunt. Pity. :-) Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 03:48, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hello again![edit]

Been a long time - glad to see you're still about as well. Going to have to visit your Livejournal and read what's up with you these days. Me, I've never had the patience to keep a journal - instead I work on here when I'm not working for pay. These Americans haven't driven me crazy yet - or at least, no more crazy than I was already. Take care, Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 20:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Village Sessions[edit]

Hi! I just noticed that you reverted some changes to the John Mayer EP page for The Village Sessions. I've reverted them because there was no explanation of why you'd reverted it other than citing vandalism, but there was no vandalism on the page and you'd reverted to a much earlier version of the page from which much had been changed already. If you wish to make a radical reversion such as this, please note it in the talk page or explain in your edit note.
Thanks!
linca linca (from pc: 58.165.55.2 13:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC) )[reply]

New content on TOPS-10 article[edit]

Hi Kay,

I have added quite a bit of content to the TOPS-10 article. Since you were a recent editor on that article, and since you are more experienced at Wiki than I, I'd appreciate your feedback on that new content and style. If you think it's going in the right direction, I can add more of the same: reference to software, notes on installation, pointers to manuals, etc. If there is content you'd want to see on TOPS-10, let me know! If you want to edit style and references, that's OK, I need pointers!

Given that TOPS-10's distribution tapes, manuals, suitable emulators,and DECUS contributions are largely intact, it constitues a sort of living museum of computing from the late 1960's through about 1990. A lot (most!) of the source code for the monitor, utilities and contributions is intact; a lot of the culture is being dumped into alt.sys.pdp10. It's a remarkable feat of preservation by lots of talented people!

Thanks!

Cbmira01 00:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.

This is per your email request and a review of your contribution history. And "sneaked" is not a word :) -- Euryalus (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Thx for bringing the Jared Jackson hoax to BLP, i think it will be deleted, i do not know why it was not speedy deleted first time. I have AFD request and TenPound has another sd. Thx RetroS1mone talk 21:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Kay Dekker (talk) 21:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

What, you don't consider this a reliable source? Kidding, kidding. Thanks for the edit-summary chuckle.

As an aside, your earlier poster may be correct, for I haven't heard the word "sneaked" used by a New York City news channel for years. :) Best, CliffC (talk) 22:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Nice to see this edit. It is the page I have most frequently edited on WP, so I'm basically responsible for the wording. Don't hate me! =) -Shootbamboo (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Food chain[edit]

Hi...noticed your comments from a while back in food chain. I'm working in there - doing some major revisions. If you have a chance - stop by.Thompsma (talk) 02:38, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]