Talk:Vidraru
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Vidraru)
from VfD:
No context, barely any content. Full text is: "Excelent place for nudism and erotic art". "What links here" suggests it is a resevoir or dam in Romania, but that information wouldn't even make a proper stub. --Woggly 10:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) Keep current redirect. --Woggly 12:28, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Excellent place for Delete. --fvw* 11:24, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)- Keep fvw* 22:59, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
Delete:Photograph it, give it a false name, and promise it a big career in Hollywood, and then delete it. Geogre 14:03, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)- Rewritten, but I can't change my vote. The reason is that what it says now is what you already know if you followed a link to the article, and if you typed it into the search, you really don't get anything. Geogre 05:06, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Come on, Geogre. I had no idea "Vidraru" was a lake before today and neither did you. "It's a stub" simply is not a criterion for deletion but an invitation to construct.Dr Zen 05:34, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- No, "it's a stub" isn't a qualification. "It's a substub" is, when the contents are the same as the title. "Vidraru" = "Lake Vidraru": If you don't know the thing by its full title, you won't/can't search it. If you do, you know it's a lake. Geogre 15:31, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Geogre, see its redirect target Lake Vidraru now. I've learned more already. Samaritan 07:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep redirect. The Lake Vidraru is better both for being a title our users will search more often and because its contents actually say more than the title. Geogre 15:31, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Rewritten, but I can't change my vote. The reason is that what it says now is what you already know if you followed a link to the article, and if you typed it into the search, you really don't get anything. Geogre 05:06, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete, better, speedy as insufficiently informative substub. Kappa 16:01, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)- Keep now Kappa 06:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete it speedily. Jayjg 20:55, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I've made it into at least a stub.Dr Zen 23:08, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep geo-stub about a man-made European lake that is completely unrelated to the nonsense sentence voters before Dr Zen were voting on. Samaritan 02:18, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Hey, I wasn't trying to fool anybody! The "what links here" made it clear that the lake was what the page referred to. It took me less time to make a stub than it would have done to list it here, so I thought, why not?Dr Zen 03:35, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I've been bold and redirected to Kappa's fortuitous creation Lake Vidraru, a better-still stub which I stumbled upon looking for an appropriate category for Vidraru (Category:Geography of Romania, it turned out). Samaritan 07:16, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, as redirected by Samaritan. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:22, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep now. -leigh 10:06, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion