Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wishbirdskull

Wishbirdskull

Wishbirdskull was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete.

• I'm not sure whether this is nonsense (therefore speedy delete), vfd material, or for cleanup.-gadfium (talk) 04:45, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone can write something intelligible about it. Google turns up some interesting sites, including one that is mostly identical to this page. Another one is very different but refers to the same...idea? Both have no context or explanation, which leads me to believe this is some sort of weird publicity stunt. =Rholton 05:56, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. What the??? This is the most bizzare thing I ever read. I suspect some sort of a joke (ala Bonsai Kitten, but nowhere as notable). -[[User:Ld|Ld | talk]] 06:11, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: Sounds like some kind of magic spell. Maybe it belongs on the wiki for 'how to's... Kappa 06:32, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Cleanup. It's lacking context right now but probably is part of some culture, tribe etc. Just needs someone who knows more about it to come along and sort it out. Dan100 09:28, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wikibooks as it stands now. This definitely seems to be (the first part of?) a magic spell. It reads as if there's a further ritual not given; leaving out the second part may release a Krampus or something. If this is a notable cultural practice, who, where, when, and why should be added; and the directions probably should be transwiki'd anyways. -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:19, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Comment: Unless there is some context provided, is see no reason to send this to cleanup or to traswiki it. I urge people to view google search results for "wishbirdskull". Some listings have already been removed, but you can view the cached pages.
  • Agree with above; context is required. Kappa 19:42, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Wikibooks or Wikisource then Delete, eek. Wyss 22:07, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as someone's new age wiccan idea. Nothing against new age wiccan ideas, but the wikipedia doesn't want them. hfool 23:59, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Unless speedily and completely rewitten to provide relevant context, I vote delete. Edeans 00:22, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete I'm with Edeans. As it stands it's completely nonsensical --Fyrefiend 07:50, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
  • Sock!
• It's a pretty okay, straightforward description of a ritual practice, only totally without context or relevance. What is it? Why is it here? Delete. Auto movil 00:23, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.