Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caliente Press

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 05:05, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Caliente Press

Delete as promotional. FreplySpang (talk) 19:30, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, though I do have a special place in my heart for websites with animated flames. Kweee 19:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. They specialize in all genres? Adverts go to Wiki-Hell. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 20:03, 2005 May 10 (UTC)
• Delete this vanity press at once. Real authors work for years to learn to write well enough to earn money. Nobody needs vanity presses sucking money out of writers, and Wikipedia doesn't need to support such activity. --Stan 4.246.120.153 20:32, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No need to moralise it... with just 18 Google hits and most of those unrelated, this is way below the bar. Unrelated to my vote, I think it's amusing that their website offers Web design services but several links point to files on C: drive, like the "flipbooks" link. D'oh! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:55, May 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I don't know if this how we vote on matters like this or not, but I went to their website and they seem to be everything they claim - and are not a vanity press. Perhaps, some of the complaints are by people they may have turned down for publication? I vote, lets keep them. What do they hurt? They are just a listing just like the others. Either get rid of all or keep all.
• Delete. Non-notable vanity press. Quale 06:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.