Talk:Tinamou

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crappy merge[edit]

That was a crappy merge - I turned two clear, readable entries into one more detailed but turgid one. Anyone want to copy edit it? Time I went to bed. Tannin 15:59 Apr 12, 2003 (UTC)

Question: can they fly? 198.142.39.219 03:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Anaxial (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-species[edit]

Do we really need to list all the sub-species on this page? It does create a rather vast list, and the information would surely better belong on the pages for the individual species. Anaxial (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree jimfbleak (talk) 18:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question on phylogeny[edit]

It seems that tinamous are actually ratites ([1]), while ostriches are an outgroup. Should I edit this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falconfly (talk • contribs) 09:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probable error[edit]

Tinamous do have a keel. See article on Palaeognathae== Birdcall (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

I think I would slit this article into a text adn a list of species. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have already created List of tinamidae, I just haven't done what I normally do on lists, (range). speednat (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Closest relatives: moa of New Zealand[edit]

Interesting developments to be incorporated into the article. First the NZ Herald version, then the paper it derives from:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/science/news/article.cfm?c_id=82&objectid=10623539

http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/59/1/90

Kahuroa (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration[edit]

Much of the content in the article was added by User:Speednat, mainly from HBW and a couple of other sources. I do not have access to these sources, nor most others regarding the family. I have done a fair amount of copy-editing, structuring and adding images (possibly too many) from Commons, but have not been able to add much textual content. The article contains several unreferenced statements and needs work on referencing as well as adding content where there are gaps in coverage. Maias (talk) 01:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have access to the HBW. ¿Which segments of the text need references? Ornithodiez (talk) 02:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ornithodiez - thanks for the offer. I cannot give you a simple answer. I think the article probably needs someone who has HBW to hand going through the text, picking up the unreffed statements and seeing if they are covered in HBW. Some may need to be deleted at some point if they cannot be backed up. Maias (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A minor style thing needing a decision. Some author initials are separated by spaces, some are not, needs consistency. I've trimmed the map and fixed a couple of refs Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jim. I don't have any personal preference. If you have a preferred style, go with that. Maias (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've settled for spaced with full stops, I've also removed semicolons from Smith; & Jones type refs.
Forced image sizes are unpopular because they override user settings. My inclination is to remove them all unless there's an obvious reason for not doing so, but I thought it best to raise here first Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. Maias (talk) 12:00, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the information that I added I gleaned from HBW, I also used bits of other books; however if there is any material that needs referencing please let me know. I always thought I added too many references. I have tried to pull information from the original sources ie from sources referenced in HBW, however a lot of those sources are foreign and I am not multi-lingual.

speednat (talk) 20:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated and cleaned up all the references into the same style. I have also added dead link templates to the Tinamou Research Group as I cannot seem to find it anymore. When I get to school on Monday, I will see if I can reference all of the facts attributed to them to other sources so that I can just delete them. I am excited to see so much work get done on this page as I felt that it was way under represented. speednat (talk) 19:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tinamou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tinamou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tinamou&oldid=1194039557"