User talk:203.15.226.132

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 203.15.226.132, is registered to National Library of Australia and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals or a Wi-Fi hotspot, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock or Template:School block. Public terminals and Wi-Fi hotspots may have set expiry times (usually in 30- or 60-minute intervals); consider this in deciding a block duration. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation; network administrators may be able to disable access to the network by offenders.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Specifically, you were mentioned at WP:ANI#Cmjohnson65. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 00:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Instant coffee— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm El cid, el campeador. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Arthur Miller, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ‡ _ᐁT₳LKᐃ 01:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Arthur Miller, you may be blocked from editing. Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ‡ _ᐁT₳LKᐃ 02:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WWE Global Warning[edit]

Please stop removing the WWE Global Warning section of the Professional wrestling in Australia page. A discussion for its removal needs to be created first to get consensus, as it is a major section.

My take on this is that WWE officially recognises Global Warning as a PPV. It is under the PPV section on the WWE Network. It doesn't matter if it is a glorified house show or not. Super Show Down was but is still a PPV. Global Warning was a huge event with 50,000+ in attendance and has been released on DVD twice, both in 2002 and 2018. 08:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus was already reached - four times! It's not notable! "Huge event"? No unsourced BS thanks! Personal opinion not allowed here! 203.15.226.132 (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

StaticVapor's comment concerning Addicted4517 is in no way comparable to the accusation of criminal behavior you're attributed to him, You were warned to stop with hyperbole and inflammatory comments. Acroterion (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.15.226.132 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block exonerates the real harasser, who by default admitted to accusing another user of stalking by removing the comment and for this reason was the inflammatory one. I was right to point this out to him and this was not harassment or a personal attack. He should be warned for his conduct. Blocking me won't change this fact and defending another user as I was doing is not against the rules. Neither is pointing out that it is a criminal act under a proper and real statute of law. The accusation of hyberbole is ridiculous and laughable, and an over reaction if anything. I have no vendetta either as the blocking admin seems to think. 203.15.226.132 (talk) 04:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Regardless of what others do, which is not relevant for your unblock request, I too think that you were stoking the problem and that Acroterion was quite correct to step in and block you. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

To the reviewing administrator, this block should stay. The conduct by this person has been beyond what is claimed. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff the lot of you then, letting criminal acts go unpunished! 203.15.226.132 (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended to original term and talkpage access revoked. Acroterion (talk) 23:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kobo, Ethiopia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 00:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Trousers, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Curbon7 (talk) 07:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Chief Justice of Australia, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 03:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Agoge. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Syskerr91 (talk) 08:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Empty Fort Strategy, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 08:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

You seem to have a vendetta against the word "family" being used on Wikipedia, often changing it to a word with a different meaning entirely. Please familiarize yourself with WP:MOS and other guidelines before continuing to make these types of edits. MilkboneJar (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Parmenides, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sima Yi, you may be blocked from editing. Enough with the vendetta against the word "family," please. MilkboneJar (talk) 15:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gracchi. You have been warned repeatedly yet you persist in replacing "family" with "house" and in this case have made other ungrammatical and bizarrely phrased unidiomatic changes. If you wish to continue editing Wikipedia, you need to stop trying to change normal English to your odd and downright wrong preferences. NebY (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mausoleum of Khoja Ahmed Yasawi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sumanuil. 03:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.