Talk:Gyeongsang dialect

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages High‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I cleaned up a fair bit of the grammar but am not quite sure what they are trying to say in the last paragraph. The phrase "...were exclusively possessed by their surroundings." needs help but I just can't determine what they mean.--Stockwell 06:05, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think it just means that high end bureaucrats were primarily drawn from the area. Not entirely sure though. Balancer 11:22, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

- As it was written this statement seemed a bit biased in the NPOV department. Since it needed work anyway, I think it is best to shorten it up a bit. Anyone with more specific information as to the origin of a dialect bias would be welcome to clarify this section. Also edited and wikified the article. Gblaz 19:44, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

About deletion[edit]

This phenomenon can also be observed in tag questions.

Eopje, geujya? as opposed to Eopji, geureotchi? - It isn't there, is it?

a in Eopje, geujya is different from that of question marker "na" because "Eopje, geujya" is the resulf of contraction "Eopje, geu(reu)ji anna" (geureuji anna > geureujyanna > geujyanna > geujya). - Airridi 05:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know enough about Busanmal to agree or disagree with your comments, but the point still stands. The a of anna is still preserved in geujya, so we can say the a vowel is used for yes/no questions. Also, please note the article now uses a not na to be more general. --Kjoonlee 15:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updates[edit]

Woah, the Korean and Japanese editions of Wikipedia have overtaken this article by leaps and bounds. We need to catch up IMHO. :) --Kjoonlee 21:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gyeongsang dialect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041226083748/http://yu.ac.kr/~koredu/dapsa/etc.htm to http://yu.ac.kr/~koredu/dapsa/etc.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]