Talk:Byron Looper

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Tennessee Low‑importance

	Tennessee portal Byron Looper is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Tennessee may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

It is incorrect to say that the Tennessee Republican Party supported another candidate in the 1998 Congressional primary; it is banned from supporting anyone in a contested primary due to its bylaws. It is true that no prominent Republicans supported Looper and that many supported Walt Massey, the eventually primary (but not general election) winner; others supported the other two candidates, but not Looper. Also, it is incorrect to say that the former law about a candidate's name being removed from the ballot in the event of death was "obscure", it may have been poorly-known, but was in a law book given to all election commissioners upon their election. I feel that it is wrong for Looper to be included in the category "Tennessee state senators", for he never was one, only the murderer of one. Someone should write an article about Mrs. Burks for inclusion in that topic. I'm not saying Looper doesn't belong in Wikipedia, sadly he undoubtedly does, just as Sirhan Sirhan, Arthur Bremer, Lee Harvey Oswald and such do, just on a smaller scale. (You wouldn't include Lee Harvey Oswald in the category "Presidents of the United States" even if he had in fact filed to run against JFK, would you?)

Rlquall 04:28, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I wrote this article, and I do agree with you viz Looper's not needing to be included in the Tennessee State Senators category. As for the other things I will take this under advisement and do a rewrite this weekend if you or somebody else doesn't get to it first. Thanks. Actually, I'm going to go ahead and pull the Category link off of here. I quite agree with all the other changes you've made. Thanks. Thehappysmith

My memory may be failing me, but some of the phrasing in this article seems to be almost verbatim from a news story I saw on the incident when it happened. Mind you, it was something like ten years ago when I saw the story (and it may just be a case of the wording being very similar, not identical), but particularly the description of Sen. Burks and the police investigation...it just feels very similar.Tyrenon (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

Does anybody know if image of Looper made available to the press and public by the Tennessee Department of Corrections at http://www.tn.gov/correction/media/inmatephotos.html would be acceptable for use on Wikipedia? Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 23:55, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are copyright issues with use of an image from the state. I don't think "fair use" applies because it's not irreplaceable -- it is at least theoretically possible to get a new photo of any living person. --Orlady (talk) 05:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's not theoretically possible anymore. --67.82.200.194 (talk) 23:15, 26 June 2013 (UTC) (edit: that was me, lost tiree, lost dutch :O, i just forgot to log in --Lost tiree, lost dutch :O (talk) 23:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC) )[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Byron Looper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Byron Looper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Byron Looper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140611183544/http://www.tmaa.us/pdfs/09winter/beyke_feb09.pdf to http://www.tmaa.us/pdfs/09winter/beyke_feb09.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Middle name[edit]

Were the parentheses legally part of his middle name? The presentation varies throughout this article. --Khajidha (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]