Talk:City of Denver (train)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCity of Denver (train) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 13, 2017Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 17, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when the Union Pacific Railroad re-launched its streamlined City of Denver passenger train in 1954, it included a pair of Pacific series sleeping cars?

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:City_of_Los_Angeles - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 05:38, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:City of Los Angeles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The move has been carried out.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago-Omaha speed[edit]

The article says that "the City of Denver covered the Chicago–Omaha portion of its route in 7 hours 26 minutes at an average speed of 75.3 miles per hour", which is supported by Klein. There must be an error in the source, as the distance from Chicago to Omaha on the C&NW was 488 miles, and a 7 hr 26 min. timing converts to 65.7 mph, so Klein's math does not work. (In February 1941 the train was scheduled to cover that distance in 7 hours 41 minutes, Official Guide, Feb. 1941, p. 812, for an average speed of 65.5 mph. Perhaps Klein was using the timing of 7 hours 26 minutes for the 485 miles to Council Bluffs.) Kablammo (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're absolutely right; I'm at a loss to account for the discrepancy. I'll see if I can find a contemporary account. Mackensen (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Schafer gives a more reasonable figure of 66 mph without qualification; I've added that made a note about Klein since he's generally authoritative and it will come up again. Mackensen (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]