User talk:Azmaverick623

Welcome!

Hello, Azmaverick623, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:53, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)

Cartoons[edit]

Dear Azmaveric,

An insult cannot find place in a wiki article! It is against the rules, not my reverts.

At the article 'Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy' the cartoons about Propher Mohammed is posted. 1.3 billion Muslims are considering this as an insult. I know that an insult cannot find place in a wiki article. I would like to ask you please do something for it. We can discuss the issue without pictures too. That is totally unresponsible to put those cartoons to the article. It is very dangerous and a step towards clush of civilizations. Resid Gulerdem 19:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cartoons[edit]

Showing the figures of Mohammed is disturbing muslims. And it is a insult to Islam. In Islam making and also looking the figures of Mohammed is forbidden.That is raping the holy things of Islam.And it is not about "freedom".--Erdemsenol 00:38, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of plaigarism[edit]

Azmaveric, I suggest you remove your implicit accusation of plaigarism against me on the AMMO (US Air Force) talk page. It is libelous. Mrpex

First of all, anything I put on the talk pages of this website, I expect to stay there, even if I have to retract it later. It will not get deleted by me under any circumstances.

Second of all, had you actually read the article you referenced on libel, you would understand that in order to win such a case, you would have to prove that I had acted with negligence in my statement that the article was taken out of a recruiting pamphlet. Having spent four years in AFJROTC, I know what kind of language recruiters use, and the article IMHO had a pro-AMMO bias, which is typical of an effort to promote something. My statement was my opinion, and seeing as how I made only one such post, with no personal attacks, I not only did not violate any civil or criminal law, I didn't even violate Wikipedia policy, as my intentions were completely honorable IMO.

I also suggest that you take a look at WP:NLT and WP:AGF.

And I am a criminal justice major, so if you have any other questions about this I'd be glad to answer them.

Good day, Maverick 03:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Azmaverick623, I am only asking you to remove the statement in which you state that my original writing was "Definitely straight from the recruiter's pamphlets", and any other suggestion that I plagairized any other part of my writings, or to provide evidence that I did, indeed, copy my writings directly from some "recruiter's pamphlets." If you can cite a verifiable "recruiter pamphlet" that my statements were copied from, then I will rescind my stand that my words were truly my own.

I can assure you that the words written were my own.

Please remove the accusation, or cite the source that you state that I copied my writings from.

I'm not trying to start an argument or fight. But I honestly feel that what you have written unfairly tries to convince neutral readers that I have plaigarized my work, and I feel that that is an unfair, and untrue, personal attack.

C'mon, be a pal.

BTW, you weren't a "623" in the U.S. Air Force, were you?

Mrpex

JFK assasination (moved from user page)[edit]

"I've just spent 2 hours both going over the article, looking at the sources, and looking at your attacks on other editors:"

This what you left on my talk page. You didn't give any examples. The first step in persuasive writing is when you make a statement provide a reference or an example.

RPJ 00:03, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sybil Ludington[edit]

Sorry for the delay in responding to your message concerning Sybil Ludington, but I'm still learning how to use Wikipedia. You said that you grew up near the cemetery where she is buried. I do not live in the area, but I travel to Putnam County once in a while. I like the hamlet of Patterson and have taken many pictures there. Many years ago, I went hunting in a cooperative area at Birch Hill. I've gone to the Wonder Lake State Park several times. It's unfortunate that Putnam County is undergoing tremendous development and is losing its bucolic character. Have you visited the Wikipedia articles for Patterson and Carmel? I posted pictures there, too.

RfC on RPJ[edit]

Hi. I'm advocating a case on behalf of a user who is experiencing numerous problems with RPJ. I can see from RPJ's talk page that you have interacted with him in the past. If you have a moment, would you be so kind as to head over to the RfC page and leave any guidance that might help in resolving this dispute. Thanks so much, and have a great day! →Bobby← 15:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice that I have filed a request for arbitration concerning RPJ. Feel free to add any comments you feel are necessary. Ramsquire ^{(throw me a line)} 23:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]