Talk:World Cricket Tsunami Appeal

World Cricket Tsunami Appeal received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

|

A fact from World Cricket Tsunami Appeal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the highlight event of the World Cricket Tsunami Appeal is a 2-match ODI series between a World XI and an Asian XI?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/January.

Wikipedia

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Untitled[edit]

"First ODI" section looks more like a commentary. needs to be re-written. i would do it, if i wasn't so busy with other things more important than wikipedia :) ! Jam2k 19:18, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)

I would argue that it looks like a commentary on the match because that's actually (by and large) what it is. It's a report on what happened during the game, and it's difficult to write that without it looking like commentary. I'd be happy to perform surgery on it if you're too busy, but if you've got the time to make some suggestions (either here or on my Talk page) as to how it can keep being a report on the match and cease being commentary, that would be a great help. BigHaz 22:22, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I agree, it is a commentary. Squash 02:36, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Again, if anyone has any constructive suggestions as to how to "de-commentary" it, then I'd be happy to run those changes through. Just saying "It's a commentary" doesn't exactly help anywhere, since (as I said above), that's sort of the point. BigHaz 22:36, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with it having a reasonable commentary section. Perhaps cutting the commentary down slightly would be a good thing - some of the detail is perhaps unneccessary - but I think that since the main part of the appeal was the playing of a match there should be a reasonable summary of what happened in the match. Grutness|^hello?

00:10, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Exactly my point. The article on the Border-Gavaskar Trophy (test series between India and Australia) contains descriptions of each series because that's what the trophy is all about. Likewise, this article should contain a reasonable description of the match, since if the match hadn't been played then there would be no World Cricket Tsunami Appeal. I daresay that once the second match has been played, there'd be various editing that could be done to this article to cover both matches, but in lieu of that I think we've got a reasonable thing going here, unless Jam2k or Squash would like to make the odd suggestion about what can/should be done to improve it. BigHaz 01:03, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Peer review[edit]

Now the second ODI has been cancelled, I'm putting this page on peer review, as I'd be interested to see if it could be worked up to be featured on Wikipedia:Featured articles, jguk 07:54, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Portal link[edit]

I have transfered the Cricket portal link from the beginning of the article to a "see also" section. It seemed an obstruction and was distracting, and also, perhaps not so directly relevant that it need be placed there. There is a template for portal links that is used in articles, which, although placed at the beginning of many articles, is progressively being transfer to the end (alongside Commons footers).-- Cyberjunkie ^TALK 29 June 2005 14:34 (UTC)