Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Look Now

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 09:35, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

There were 10 votes to keep, 0 to delete.

Don't Look Now[edit]

totally non-sensical if you ask me, at the verry least it needs to be renamed and have a stub message stuck on it.--Ryan B. (Talk, contributions) 22:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Strong Keep Not sure why this might be VfD'ed. It's a real movie http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069995/ and a fairly famous one at that. I'm perplexed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:21, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Well that saved me looking the ID up. (-: Uncle G 22:47, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)
Keep, real and quite famous movie. Could stand some cleanup, though...the last sentence is admittedly a bit hard to parse -- Ferkelparade π 22:25, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I don't know why this was VfD'd, personnally. A poorly written article is not grounds for deletion. Half the fun is in fixing these things up. 23skidoo 22:46, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Strong keep. No reason to be on VfD. Binadot 23:08, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep Looks fine now. --Etimbo | Talk 00:13, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep I', not entirely sure why this came to be the subject of a VfD. It seems an odd film, I'll give you that, and the article isn't going to get featured any time soon, but that's no reason for a deletion. Thryduulf 00:27, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, cleanup and expand. That table looks jarring and probably needs changing. Megan1967 00:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It's a template common to several film articles. There might be a better one. Uncle G 11:20, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)
Keeeeeeep. --JuntungWu 07:56, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. I am wondering right now why this was even submitted to VfD. Seems fine to me. The table needs Cleanup or Expansion. --WikiFan04 02:47, 20 Jan 2005 (CST)
- If you don't like the look of Template:Infobox_Film, then be bold. Uncle G 15:28, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
KEEP Why was this on on VfD anyway?? Oh. Must have been because of sex. Oh my oh me. Oh me oh my. Edeans 03:56, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.