Talk:Neptunium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNeptunium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2014Good article nomineeListed
September 29, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
February 15, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 6, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that neptunium is found in at least three allotropes‍—‌one orthorhombic, one tetragonal, and one body-centered cubic?
Current status: Good article

Vandilism[edit]

i was browseing this page when i noticed the vandilism, it is something like "POOPPOOPPOOPPOOP"People please don't do that it promotes other distructive instics so PLEASE STOP!

Update on space group[edit]

A couple years ago, I tagged issues with the space group. There were no less than four separate symbols in scholarly sources (P42, P421, P4212, and P4/nmm). The source for symbol P42 cites a source that instead gives symbol P4212, so P42 is clearly a typo. I recently figured out that P421 is an archaic symbol from the 1935 edition of the international tables [1] (it was subsequently replaced with symbol P4212). Basically, notation aside, all sources agree on P4212, except Mehl 2016 who claims he re-analyzed the original data, and found a slightly higher symmetry of P4/nmm (P4/nmm is a minimal supergroup of P4212 [2], so this is a relatively minor difference). 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 02:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024[edit]

"many false claims" is stated in the article, please specify what false claims or remove the line. The element was first discoverd by a romanian and it was not proved as a false or true claim. 84.232.193.86 (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naming[edit]

I think the description on how it was named in the introduction paragraph is kind of clumsy. Anyone else agree? Jokem (talk) 03:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced it with a more concise text. Not sure whether we should keep the mention of uranium even if it is quite redundant with transuranic. Feel free to improve. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]