Talk:Kangaskhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Today an unregistered user has added that there's a 25% chance of capturing a Male Kangaskhan. From what I remember, Kangaskhan is one of those pokémon where all specimens are female (like Jynx and Chansey) but now I'm not so sure. Can anyone confirm either sentence?
--Fern 12:17, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Well, according to Google, the only references to a 25% chance of capturing a male Kangaskhan is Wikipedia and a mirror. Everyone else seems to think it's 100% female, and I recall that being it as well. I suspect it was either a subtle vandalism or some confused person. I changed it back. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 00:27, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

Substitute in Pokémon Stadium[edit]

While the baby Kangaskhan may not be playable by itself, doesn't the "substitute" model used in the Pokémon Stadium series of games look like a baby Kangaskhan? Also, that model substitutes the glitch Pokémon that are imported into the game, such as Missingno.. Please note this. --Geopgeop 09:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why no baby?[edit]

i am wondering why this pokemon has no baby form. It just seems a little creepy for a pokemon to hatch out of its egg and already have an offspring. If it where to have a Babey form it most likely would be blue like the babey in every Kangaskhan's pouch (including a newly hatched one, sorry, can not get over that fact)HHS.student

That's just the way the game was made. -SaturnYoshi THE VOICES 15:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Fictional dinosaurs[edit]

The category "fictional dinosaurs" was removed before, then re-added a while later. I have removed it again, as per the discussion on the WikiProject Dinosaurs talkpage. Please don't add it again without discussion. -pinkgothic 14:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]