Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Eagles

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep --SPUI (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Newcastle Eagles[edit]

POV, not notable, should be re-written at the very least--Silversmith 14:23, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unless a major POV cleanup occurs. - Longhair | Talk 14:27, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- changing vote to Keep, article quality has improved. - Longhair | Talk 02:34, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I've cleaned it up and made it a stub. Rick K 23:02, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
Keep now, ty RickK. Kappa 01:10, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Current champion in national professional basketball league. Capitalistroadster 01:14, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Unresearched nomination which should not have been made. Oliver Chettle 02:29, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I withdraw my Nomination then. Although it still only gets 676 hits on google.

[1] --Silversmith 11:09, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Works better without the definite article [2] Kappa 14:12, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow 998 hits. I was worried for a second there they might have actually been notable. --Silversmith 14:30, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Squeamish? Kappa 17:22, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.