Talk:Zero-point energy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zero-point energy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bell Labs show Casimir force on nano machine[edit]
http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/021401/Quantum_effect_moves_machine_021401.html
A very interesting article about the work Bell Labs has been doing to look into the potential problems of "Nano bots" due to zero-point energy.
Don't forget to Spellcheck[edit]
The header "Fondational Physics" does not do wonders for your credibility. Use your spell-checker!
Adopting New Views as a Key For New Findings[edit]
Don't use talk pages for advertising.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Sketchy reference to Feyman quote[edit]
This page includes a reference to a Feyman quote that says there is enough ZPE in a lightbulb to boil all the world's oceans. The source for this quote is a single Guardian quote that itself provides no context. Further, there are no other references that back up Feyman ever made this claim.
It's an extraordinary claim and it underpins a lot of conspiracy thinking related to ZPE. It would be a good idea to get additional citations or consider dropping the quote. 76.209.240.71 (talk) 03:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC).
- As it is from Feynman it is probably accurate, but I agree that it needs a source. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC).
- I agree. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2023 (UTC).
- I deleted the sentence as the source is not reliable on physics. The short article makes the claim about Feynman and Wheeler but provides no source. It's basically gossip at this point. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
"Purported applications" is primarily primary sources.[edit]
The "Purported applications" is too long per the policy WP:UNDUE. AFAICT it attempts to enumerate every ZPE application ever proposed.
Most of the refs are primary sources or "news" articles about those publications. The section should be based on secondary science sources (as this topic is scientific ZPE not fiction or entertainment). Johnjbarton (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Physical sciences
- B-Class physics articles
- High-importance physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of High-importance
- B-Class Alternative Views articles
- Mid-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles